当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Neurosci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Synaptic Plasticity Forms and Functions.
Annual Review of Neuroscience ( IF 13.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-08 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-090919-022842
Jeffrey C Magee 1 , Christine Grienberger 1
Affiliation  

Synaptic plasticity, the activity-dependent change in neuronal connection strength, has long been considered an important component of learning and memory. Computational and engineering work corroborate the power of learning through the directed adjustment of connection weights. Here we review the fundamental elements of four broadly categorized forms of synaptic plasticity and discuss their functional capabilities and limitations. Although standard, correlation-based, Hebbian synaptic plasticity has been the primary focus of neuroscientists for decades, it is inherently limited. Three-factor plasticity rules supplement Hebbian forms with neuromodulation and eligibility traces, while true supervised types go even further by adding objectives and instructive signals. Finally, a recently discovered hippocampal form of synaptic plasticity combines the above elements, while leaving behind the primary Hebbian requirement. We suggest that the effort to determine the neural basis of adaptive behavior could benefit from renewed experimental and theoretical investigation of more powerful directed types of synaptic plasticity.

中文翻译:


突触可塑性的形式和功能。

突触可塑性,神经元连接强度的活动依赖性变化,长期以来一直被认为是学习和记忆的重要组成部分。计算和工程工作通过直接调整连接权重来证实学习的力量。在这里,我们回顾了四种广泛分类的突触可塑性形式的基本要素,并讨论了它们的功能和局限性。尽管标准的、基于相关性的、赫布突触可塑性几十年来一直是神经科学家的主要关注点,但它本质上是有限的。三因素可塑性规则通过神经调节和资格痕迹补充 Hebbian 形式,而真正的监督类型通过添加目标和指导性信号走得更远。最后,最近发现的海马形式的突触可塑性结合了上述元素,同时留下了主要的赫布要求。我们建议,确定适应性行为的神经基础的努力可以受益于对更强大的定向类型突触可塑性的新实验和理论研究。

更新日期:2020-07-09
down
wechat
bug