Swift-Gallant et al. (2020) provide a thought-provoking perspective on the topic of digit ratio research, research that has had some prominence in the journal Hormones and Behavior, and is research that has garnered much controversy. In this commentary on their paper, we add to the discussion of why there is skepticism of the use of digit ratios as a measure of individual differences in prenatal androgens, we comment on the mis-use of the facial width-to-height ratio as a measure of individual differences in testosterone, the grey areas in the interpretation of evidence, and we address the concern raised in their article regarding editorial policies at Hormones and Behavior (spoiler alert: there are no secret policies).

中文翻译：

---

面对指骨现象和编辑政策：对Swift-Gallant，Johnson，Di Rita和Breedlove（2020）的评论。

Swift-Gallant等。（2020年）提供了关于数字比率研究这一主题的发人深省的观点，该研究在《激素与行为》杂志上有突出的表现，并且引起了很多争议。在他们对这篇论文的评论中，我们增加了对为什么使用数字比例来衡量产前雄激素个体差异的怀疑，我们评论了面部宽高比的误用。量度睾丸激素的个体差异（证据解释中的灰色区域），我们解决了他们在《激素与行为》中有关编辑政策的文章中提出的关注（破坏者警告：没有秘密政策）。