This study examined if participants respond to different types of suggestions, including hypnosis, uniquely or similarly. This study used 9 suggestibility measures and hypothesized a 3-factor model. It was hypothesized that hypnosis, Chevreul's pendulum, and body-sway would load on the first factor; the odor test, progressive weights, and placebo on the second factor; and conformity, persuasibility, and interrogative suggestibility would load on the third factor. The study comprised 110 college students. Factor analyses failed to result in three factors. Additional attempts at two and three-factor models were also rejected. Hypnosis had no strong relationship with the various suggestibility measures. Thus, no clearly delineated factor structure of suggestibility emerged, indicating that the domain of suggestibility seems to be neither a single attribute, trait, or group of related abilities. Implications are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

催眠反应和非催眠建议：分散，相似或相同？

这项研究检查了参与者是否以独特或类似的方式回应了不同类型的建议，包括催眠。这项研究使用了9种建议措施，并假设了一个三因素模型。据推测，催眠，雪佛勒的钟摆和身体摇摆会成为首要因素。第二个因素是气味测试，渐进式体重和安慰剂；整合性，说服力和疑问暗示性将是第三个因素。这项研究包括110名大学生。因素分析未能导致三个因素。在二因子和三因子模型上的其他尝试也被拒绝。催眠与各种暗示措施没有密切关系。因此，没有出现明确描述的暗示性因素结构，表明暗示性领域似乎既不是单个属性，特征也不是相关能力的组合。讨论了含义。