The current meta-analysis accumulates empirical findings for the familiarity temporal effect (FTE) in duration judgments (the duration of more familiar stimuli is judged to be longer than that of less familiar stimuli). It brings together data from 2 separate literatures: time perception and processing fluency. In doing so, this review offers more and stronger evidence for testing the reliability of the effect; it defines the relevant moderators for addressing the validity of the 2 main explanations for the FTE: the attentional and the fluency-attributional hypotheses. The analysis (random effect model) of a total of 128 experiments (N = 3,338) showed that the effect of familiarity on perceived short durations (seconds) is highly reliable (g = .52); the same (or a similar) effect also occurs for other fluency manipulations (g = .51). The analysis supports assumptions generated by both the attentional and the fluency-misattributional explanations, suggesting that more research is needed to understand their possible dynamic relationship. Hence, this meta-analysis provides important guidance for future research with regard to time estimates. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

对熟悉的时间效应的荟萃分析综述：测试注意和流利属性假设的假设。

当前的荟萃分析在持续时间判断中积累了对经验时间效应（FTE）的经验发现（判断为较熟悉的刺激的持续时间长于较不熟悉的刺激的持续时间）。它汇集了来自2个不同文献的数据：时间感知和处理流畅性。这样，本次审查为检验效果的可靠性提供了越来越多的证据。它定义了相关的主持人，以解决FTE的两个主要解释的有效性：注意力假设和流畅性假设。对总共128个实验（随机数模型）的分析（N = 3,338）显示，熟悉程度对感知的短持续时间（秒）的影响是高度可靠的（g = .52）；对于其他流利性操作，也会产生相同（或相似）的效果（g = .51）。该分析支持由注意力和流利性-歧义性解释所产生的假设，表明需要更多的研究来理解它们可能的动态关系。因此，这种荟萃分析为将来的时间估计提供了重要的指导。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。