当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Vet. Intern. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Agreement of stall-side and laboratory major crossmatch tests with the reference standard method in horses.
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-04 , DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15710
Melissa S Fenn 1 , Araba D Bortsie-Aryee 2 , Gillian A Perkins 1 , Sabine Mann 2 , Joy E Tomlinson 3 , Emma M Wood 2 , Susan E Mix 2 , Tracy Stokol 2
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND Crossmatching is used to prevent life-threatening transfusion reactions in horses. Laboratory methods are laborious and technically challenging, which is impractical during emergencies. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES Evaluate agreement between a stall-side crossmatch kit (KIT) and a laboratory method (LAB) in horses with known and unknown blood types. ANIMALS Twenty-four blood-typed and alloantibody-screened healthy adult horses (Aim 1) and 156 adult horses of unknown blood type (Aim 2). METHODS Prospective, blinded study. Expected positive (n = 35) and negative (n = 36) crossmatches among 24 antibody and blood-typed horses were used to determine sensitivity and specificity of KIT and LAB against the reference method. Agreement in 156 untyped horses was evaluated by reciprocal crossmatch (n = 156). RESULTS Sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) for LAB and KIT compared with expected reactions was 77.1% (59.9%-90.0%) and 91.4% (77.0%-98.2%), and specificity 77.8% (60.9%-89.9%) and 73.5% (55.6%-87.1%), respectively. The KIT was 100% sensitive for Aa reactions; LAB was 100% sensitive for Qab; and both were 100% sensitive for Ca. Cohen's κ agreement for LAB and KIT with expected positive and negative reactions (n = 71) was moderate (0.55 [0.36-0.74]) and substantial (0.65 [0.47-0.82]), respectively. Agreement was fair comparing LAB with KIT in Aim 1 (0.30 [0.08-0.52]) and in untyped horses in Aim 2 (0.26 [0.11-0.41]). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Agreement between KIT and LAB with expected reactions was blood type dependent. Performance of both methods depends on blood type prevalence.

中文翻译:

马匹的失速侧和实验室主要交叉比赛测试与参考标准方法的协议。

背景技术交叉匹配用于防止马中危及生命的输血反应。实验室方法费力且在技术上具有挑战性,这在紧急情况下不切实际。假设/目标评估血型已知和未知的马匹的失速侧交叉匹配试剂盒(KIT)和实验室方法(LAB)之间的一致性。动物24只经血型和同种抗体筛选的健康成年马(目标1)和156名未知血型的成年马(目标2)。方法前瞻性,盲法研究。使用24种抗体和血型马之间预期的阳性(n = 35)和阴性(n = 36)交叉匹配来确定KIT和LAB对参考方法的敏感性和特异性。通过相互交叉匹配(n = 156)评估了156匹无类型马的一致性。结果LAB和KIT的敏感性(95%置信区间[CI])与预期反应相比为77.1%(59.9%-90.0%)和91.4%(77.0%-98.2%),特异性为77.8%(60.9%-89.9%) )和73.5%(55.6%-87.1%)。KIT对Aa反应具有100%的敏感性;LAB对Qab敏感度为100%;而且两者对Ca的敏感性均为100%。Cohen对LAB和KIT具有预期的阳性和阴性反应(n = 71)的κ一致性分别为中等(0.55 [0.36-0.74])和充分(0.65 [0.47-0.82])。在目标1(0.30 [0.08-0.52])和目标2中无类型马匹(0.26 [0.11-0.41])中比较LAB和KIT的协议是公平的。结论和临床意义试剂盒和LAB的预期反应一致取决于血型。两种方法的性能取决于血型的患病率。
更新日期:2020-02-04
down
wechat
bug