Beset by detection of replication failures and questionable research practices over the last decade, psychology has been deemed by many to be in crisis. The situation is exceptional not only for the many investigative practices being scrutinized but also for the attention given to the undue influence of psychologists' psychology on those practices. Comparative analysis of 2 crises finds that the earlier one focused on the experimenters' activities within the laboratory, whereas the current concerns center on experimenters' postexperimental work. Whereas the previous crisis did include deep concerns about experimenters, the currently offered psychologies of fellow psychologists are distinctive in their frequency, intensity, and considerable reliance upon established knowledge about human thought and behavior. In so utilizing scientific psychology to assess psychology, the current appraisals give richer evidence of the circuitry of psychological knowledge as it travels from the laboratory outward and back. They give considerable attention to the scientists' moral characteristics, whereas the earlier crisis generated concerns about experimenters' conduct in the laboratory and the politics surrounding the application of psychological knowledge. Through their direct discussions of personal and moral conduct, the assessments also resonate with uncertainties about scientists' self-control, normative ethics, and emotions. Taken together, the psychologies and attendant uncertainties illuminate present conditions of psychology's scientific self and invite reflection on the close connections between that self, ethos, and epistemology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

危机时期的心理学家的心理学家。

在过去十年中，由于检测到复制失败和可疑的研究实践而感到困扰，许多人认为心理学处于危机之中。这种情况不仅对于正在接受审查的许多调查实践，而且对于对心理学家的心理学对这些实践的不当影响的关注引起的关注都是例外。对两种危机的比较分析发现，较早的一种危机集中在实验室中的实验者活动上，而当前的关注点集中在实验者的实验后工作上。尽管先前的危机确实引起了对实验人员的深切关注，但当前提供的其他心理学家的心理学在其频率，强度和对人类思想和行为方面已建立的知识的依赖方面都与众不同。在利用科学心理学评估心理学的过程中，当前的评估为心理学知识从实验室向外和向后传播提供了更丰富的证据。他们对科学家的道德特征给予了极大的关注，而较早的危机引起了人们对实验人员在实验室中的行为以及有关应用心理知识的政治的关注。通过对个人和道德行为的直接讨论，评估结果也引起了科学家自我控制，规范伦理和情感的不确定性。综合起来，心理学和伴随的不确定性阐明了心理学的科学自我的当前状况，并引起了对自我，精神和认识论之间紧密联系的反思。