Discusses a poem by Thomas Hood (1799-1845), "Craniology," which is a paradigmatic example of parodying psychological faculties for being material things. Franz Joseph Gall's (1758 -1828) term for organology was schädellehre, a German compound from schädel (skull, cranium, or pate) and lehre (teaching or doctrine). Craniology was used by some of Gall's followers, but mostly his critics; phrenology was coined in 1815 by Thomas Forster. In "Craniology," his Horatian-exemplar poem, Hood ridicules Gall's materialism. The present author notes Gall's idea that there were both intellectual and emotional faculties, which resonates well with contemporary cognitive neuroscience models of the mind. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

La Revanche de Gall。

讨论托马斯·胡德（Thomas Hood）（1799-1845）的一首诗“颅骨学”，这是模仿心理学才能成为物质事物的典范例子。弗朗兹·约瑟夫·加尔（Franz Joseph Gall）（1758 -1828）的器官学术语是schädellehre，它是来自schädel（头骨，头盖骨或头颈部）和lehre（教学或教义）的德国化合物。盖尔的一些追随者使用了颅相学，但大多数是他的批评家。颅相学由托马斯·福斯特（Thomas Forster）于1815年提出。胡德嘲讽盖尔的唯物论是他的荷兰典范诗《颅骨学》。本作者注意到加尔（Gall）的思想，即既有智力能力又有情感能力，这与现代思维的认知神经科学模型产生了很好的共鸣。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。