Over two dozen published articles (see Abersteiner et al., 2018) report a new approach to reconstructing parental kimberlite melt compositions. Abersteiner et al. (2018) advocate the primary mantle origin of salts in the Udachnaya-East kimberlite, and criticize the proposal for a crustal brine origin of these salts (Kostrovitsky et al., 2013). It is obvious that investigations claiming to disprove the classic approach to kimberlite rocks with low Na and Cl contents and low abundances of primary chlorites and sulphates (Williams, 1932; Dawson, 1980; Mitchell, 1986) should offer essential evidence. Abersteiner et al. (2018), in their detailed study of melt inclusion compositions in olivine and other minerals, include some inaccurate statements, which make their final conclusions doubtful.

中文翻译：

---

不变的金伯利岩中盐的起源。评论：“地壳污染是否参与了无蛇纹石的乌达奇纳亚河东金伯利岩的形成？Abersteiner等人的《关于父母融解，液相线集合和变迁效应的新见解》。（2018），岩石学杂志59，1467–1492

超过两篇已发表的文章（请参阅Abersteiner等人，2018）报告了一种重建亲本金伯利岩熔体成分的新方法。Abersteiner等。（2018）提倡在Udachnaya-East金伯利岩中形成盐的主要地幔来源，并批评这些盐的地壳盐起源的提议（Kostrovitsky et al。，2013）。显然，声称声称不支持低钠和氯含量，低亚氯酸盐和硫酸盐含量低的金伯利岩的经典方法的研究（Williams，1932； Dawson，1980； Mitchell，1986）应提供必要的证据。Abersteiner等。 （2018）在对橄榄石和其他矿物中熔体夹杂物成分的详细研究中，包括一些不准确的陈述，这使得他们的最终结论令人怀疑。