当前位置: X-MOL 学术Clin. Neurophysiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reliability of phrenic nerve conduction study: In healthy controls and in patients with primary lateral sclerosis
Clinical Neurophysiology ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.010
Maria Claudia Torrieri , Bruno Miranda , Marta Gromicho , Susana Pinto , Mamede de Carvalho

OBJECTIVE Phrenic nerve conduction study is a marker of hypoventilation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We aimed to evaluate its intra-rater reliability in healthy subjects and in a cohort of Primary Lateral Sclerosis (PLS) patients. METHODS Eighteen healthy subjects and 16 PLS patients were included. All subjects underwent three phrenic nerve conduction evaluations (time interval: 1 week for healthy controls; 1 year for PLS patients). We analyzed intra-rater reliability for five parameters of the diaphragmatic motor response: latency; negative-peak duration, area and amplitude; peak-to-peak amplitude. RESULTS Healthy subjects showed excellent inter-test reliability for most parameters (coefficients of variation <10%). In PLS patients coefficients of variation resulted <10% for latency and peak-to-peak amplitude, <20% for remaining parameters. Inter-test reliability was excellent for latency and peak-to-peak amplitude [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.9] and good for negative-peak amplitude and area (ICC 0.75 ≥ 0.9); duration was not reliable (ICC = 0.383). Negative peak and peak-to-peak amplitude had the least random error (respectively ±0.136 mV and ± 0.177 mV). All parameters showed homoscedasticity (R2 < 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Intra-rater reliability is high for phrenic nerve study, especially for latency, peak-to-peak and negative-peak amplitude. SIGNIFICANCE Phrenic nerve conduction study is a reliable method to monitor respiratory function.

中文翻译:

膈神经传导研究的可靠性:在健康对照和原发性侧索硬化患者中

目的 膈神经传导研究是肌萎缩侧索硬化患者换气不足的标志。我们旨在评估其在健康受试者和一组原发性侧索硬化 (PLS) 患者中的评分者内可靠性。方法 包括 18 名健康受试者和 16 名 PLS 患者。所有受试者均接受了 3 次膈神经传导评估(时间间隔:健康对照为 1 周;PLS 患者为 1 年)。我们分析了膈肌运动反应的五个参数的评分者内可靠性:潜伏期;负峰值持续时间、面积和幅度;峰峰值幅度。结果 健康受试者对大多数参数(变异系数 <10%)表现出出色的测试间可靠性。在 PLS 患者中,潜伏期和峰峰值幅度的变异系数 <10%,< 20% 用于剩余参数。延迟和峰峰值幅度[类内相关系数(ICC)> 0.9]和负峰幅度和面积(ICC 0.75 ≥ 0.9)的测试间可靠性非常好;持续时间不可靠(ICC = 0.383)。负峰值和峰峰值幅度具有最小的随机误差(分别为 ±0.136 mV 和 ± 0.177 mV)。所有参数均表现出同方差性(R2 < 0.1)。结论 对于膈神经研究,评分者内的可靠性很高,尤其是对于潜伏期、峰峰值和负峰幅度。意义 膈神经传导研究是监测呼吸功能的可靠方法。持续时间不可靠(ICC = 0.383)。负峰值和峰峰值幅度具有最小的随机误差(分别为 ±0.136 mV 和 ± 0.177 mV)。所有参数均表现出同方差性(R2 < 0.1)。结论 对于膈神经研究,评分者内的可靠性很高,尤其是对于潜伏期、峰峰值和负峰幅度。意义 膈神经传导研究是监测呼吸功能的可靠方法。持续时间不可靠(ICC = 0.383)。负峰值和峰峰值幅度具有最小的随机误差(分别为 ±0.136 mV 和 ± 0.177 mV)。所有参数均表现出同方差性(R2 < 0.1)。结论 对于膈神经研究,评分者内的可靠性很高,尤其是对于潜伏期、峰峰值和负峰幅度。意义 膈神经传导研究是监测呼吸功能的可靠方法。
更新日期:2020-05-01
down
wechat
bug