The geometry automated theorem proving area distinguishes itself by a large number of specific methods and implementations, different approaches (synthetic, algebraic, semi-synthetic) and different goals and applications (from research in the area of artificial intelligence to applications in education). Apart from the usual measures of efficiency (e.g. CPU time), the possibility of visual and/or readable proofs is also an expected output against which the geometry automated theorem provers (GATP) should be measured. The implementation of a competition between GATP would allow to create a test bench for GATP developers to improve the existing ones and to propose new ones. It would also allow to establish a ranking for GATP that could be used by "clients" (e.g. developers of educational e-learning systems) to choose the best implementation for a given intended use.

中文翻译：

---

走向几何自动证明竞赛

几何自动定理证明领域通过大量具体的方法和实现、不同的方法（合成、代数、半合成）和不同的目标和应用（从人工智能领域的研究到教育应用）而与众不同。除了通常的效率测量（例如 CPU 时间），视觉和/或可读证明的可能性也是几何自动定理证明器 (GATP) 应根据其测量的预期输出。GATP 之间竞争的实施将允许为 GATP 开发人员创建一个测试平台，以改进现有的测试平台并提出新的建议。它还允许为 GATP 建立一个可供“客户”使用的排名（例如