当前位置: X-MOL 学术Food Qual. Prefer. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of methods to develop an emotional lexicon of wine: Conventional vs Rapid-method approach
Food Quality and Preference ( IF 4.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103920
María Mora , Amanda Dupas de Matos , Virginia Fernández-Ruiz , Teresa Briz , Carolina Chaya

Abstract The development of emotional lexicons can be seen as a time- and resource-consuming activity. Several rapid methods have been developed for time-restricted studies, but the suitability of these methodologies in the development of emotional lexicons compared to conventional ones has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to test the suitability of a rapid method, as it is the Sorting Task, for emotional lexicon development compared to a conventional procedure. For this purpose, two different approaches (conventional vs rapid-method) were tested to evaluate wines. 222 consumers participated in the lexicon development procedure. A common phase of generation and filtering of the terms was carried out for the development of both lexicons. Then, two approaches were used, one applying the procedures proposed in the literature (conventional, herein as Lexicon I) and the other applying Sorting Task (rapid-method, herein as Lexicon II). To test both lexicons, consumer studies (n = 185) were conducted using a set of seven commercial wines. Both methods were helpful in discriminating emotional responses. Lexicon I reported a wine effect for 10 of the 13 emotional categories, while the Lexicon II discriminated the samples in all 15 categories. Although multifactorial analysis showed a high agreement between configurations (RV = 0.985), the emotional map of both lexicons did not follow the theoretical circumplex model of emotions. SADNESS and NOSTALGIA feelings were related to the second axis. In conclusion, both methods provided similar maps of wines, but Lexicon II was more efficient in terms of time and resources during the lexicon development.

中文翻译:

开发葡萄酒情感词典的方法比较:传统方法与快速方法

摘要 情感词典的开发可以被看作是一项耗费时间和资源的活动。已经为限时研究开发了几种快速方法,但与传统方法相比,这些方法在情感词典开发中的适用性尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是测试快速方法的适用性,因为它是排序任务,与传统程序相比,情绪词典的发展。为此,测试了两种不同的方法(传统方法与快速方法)来评估葡萄酒。222 名消费者参与了词典开发过程。为了开发这两个词典,执行了术语的生成和过滤的共同阶段。然后,使用了两种方法,一个应用文献中提出的程序(常规,在此称为 Lexicon I),另一个应用排序任务(快速方法,在此称为 Lexicon II)。为了测试这两个词典,使用一组七种商业葡萄酒进行了消费者研究(n = 185)。这两种方法都有助于区分情绪反应。Lexicon I 报告了 13 个情感类别中的 10 个的葡萄酒效应,而 Lexicon II 区分了所有 15 个类别的样本。尽管多因素分析显示配置之间的高度一致性(RV = 0.985),但两个词典的情感图并未遵循情感的理论环模型。SADNESS 和 NOSTALGIA 感觉与第二个轴有关。总之,两种方法都提供了相似的葡萄酒地图,
更新日期:2020-07-01
down
wechat
bug