当前位置: X-MOL 学术Biomarkers › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Diagnostic value of GLUT-1 in distinguishing malignant mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial cells: a meta-analysis.
Biomarkers ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-21 , DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2020.1714735
Shan-Chuan Zhong 1 , Xu-Jun Ao 2 , Shang-Hai Yu 1
Affiliation  

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated the diagnostic value of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) to distinguish malignant mesothelioma (MM) from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC), but the results are inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of GLUT-1 in distinguishing MM from RMC.Methods: A systematical search was conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the eligible studies. The Stata15 and Review Manager5.3 software programmes were used to perform the meta-analysis.Results: A total of 24 studies, including 969 MM patients and 1080 RMC individuals were explored in the meta-analysis. The summary assessments revealed that the pooled sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81) and the pooled specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98). The area under the summary ROC curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95).Conclusions: GLUT-1 is highly accurate to distinguish MM from RMC.

中文翻译:

GLUT-1在区分恶性间皮瘤和反应性间皮细胞中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析。

背景:以前的研究表明葡萄糖转运蛋白1(GLUT-1)的诊断价值,以区分恶性间皮瘤(MM)与反应性间皮细胞(RMC),但结果不一致。这项荟萃分析的目的是研究GLUT-1在区分MM和RMC中的诊断准确性。方法:一直进行到2019年5月,在PubMed,Medline,Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行系统搜索。经修订的诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)用于评估合格研究的质量。结果:在荟萃分析中共研究了24项研究,包括969例MM患者和1080例RMC患者。简要评估显示,合并的敏感性为0.73(95%CI,0.62-0.81),合并的特异性为0.95(95%CI,0.91-0.98)。摘要ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.93(95%CI:0.91-0.95)。结论:GLUT-1能够高度准确地区分MM和RMC。
更新日期:2020-04-20
down
wechat
bug