当前位置: X-MOL 学术Leukemia › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The IPSS-R more accurately captures fatigue severity of newly diagnosed patients with myelodysplastic syndromes compared with the IPSS index.
Leukemia ( IF 12.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-21 , DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0746-8
Fabio Efficace 1, 2 , Francesco Cottone 1 , Laura B Oswald 2 , David Cella 2 , Andrea Patriarca 3 , Pasquale Niscola 4 , Massimo Breccia 5 , Uwe Platzbecker 6 , Giuseppe A Palumbo 7 , Giovanni Caocci 8 , Reinhard Stauder 9 , Alessandra Ricco 10 , Duska Petranovic 11 , Jo Caers 12 , Mario Luppi 13 , Luana Fianchi 14 , Chiara Frairia 15 , Isabella Capodanno 16 , Elena Follini 17 , Chiara Sarlo 18 , Paola Fazi 1 , Marco Vignetti 1
Affiliation  

We aimed to compare fatigue of newly diagnosed patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with that of the general population (GP). We also investigated the ability of the IPSS and IPSS-R to capture severity of patient-reported fatigue at diagnostic workup. A sample of 927 newly diagnosed patients with MDS was consecutively enrolled in a large international observational study and all patients completed the FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire at baseline. Fatigue was compared with that of the GP (N = 1075) and a 3-point difference in mean scores was considered as clinically meaningful. Fatigue of MDS patients was on average 4.6 points below the mean of the GP (95% CI, -5.9 to -3.2, p < 0.001), reflecting clinically meaningful worse fatigue. Unlike the IPSS, the IPSS-R identified clearly distinct subgroups with regard to burden of fatigue. Mean scores differences compared with GP ranged from nonclinically relevant for very low risk (Δ = -1.8, 95% CI, -4.0 to 0.5, p = 0.119) to large clinically meaningful differences for very high-risk IPSS-R patients (Δ = -8.2, 95% CI, -10.3 to -6.2, p < 0.001). At diagnostic workup, fatigue of MDS is clinically meaningful worse than that reported by the GP. Compared with the IPSS classification, the IPSS-R provides a better stratification of patients with regard to fatigue severity.

中文翻译:

与IPSS指数相比,IPSS-R更准确地捕获了新诊断的骨髓增生异常综合症患者的疲劳严重程度。

我们旨在比较新诊断为骨髓增生异常综合症(MDS)与普通人群(GP)的疲劳。我们还研究了IPSS和IPSS-R在诊断检查中捕获患者报告的疲劳严重程度的能力。连续对927名新诊断的MDS患者进行了一项国际大型观察性研究,所有患者均在基线时完成了FACIT-疲劳问卷。将疲劳与GP的疲劳进行了比较(N = 1075),平均得分的3分差异被认为具有临床意义。MDS患者的疲劳平均比GP平均值低4.6点(95%CI,-5.9至-3.2,p <0.001),反映出临床上有意义的严重疲劳。与IPSS不同,IPSS-R在疲劳负担方面明确区分了不同的亚组。与GP相比,平均得分差异从非常低风险的非临床相关性(Δ= -1.8,95%CI,-4.0到0.5,p = 0.119)到非常高的IPSS-R患者的临床意义上的巨大差异(Δ= -8.2,95%CI,-10.3至-6.2,p <0.001)。在诊断检查中,MDS的疲劳在临床上比GP报告的更为严重。与IPSS分类相比,IPSS-R在疲劳严重程度方面为患者提供了更好的分层。
更新日期:2020-02-21
down
wechat
bug