当前位置: X-MOL 学术Digest. Endosc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Validation of AIMS65 to predict outcomes in acute variceal bleeding: Which risk scoring system outperforms in real practice?
Digestive Endoscopy ( IF 5.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-18 , DOI: 10.1111/den.13657
Koichiro Kawaguchi 1 , Hajime Isomoto 1
Affiliation  

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) can result in significant morbidity, mortality, and use of health care resources (i.e., consumer of blood products)1 . UGIB remains a common cause of emergency admissions worldwide but varying from potentially fatal conditions like variceal bleeding to the trivial, non-variceal UGIB (NVUGIB) like gastric erosions or esophagitis. In most cases, variceal bleeding in its acute phase (acute variceal bleeding, AVB) requires hospitalization with high dependency of urgent interventions and intensive care monitoring.

中文翻译:

验证 AIMS65 以预测急性静脉曲张出血的结果:哪个风险评分系统在实际实践中表现更好?

上消化道出血 (UGIB) 可导致显着的发病率、死亡率和医疗资源的使用(即,血液制品的消费者)1。UGIB 仍然是世界范围内急诊入院的常见原因,但从潜在的致命疾病(如静脉曲张出血)到微不足道的非静脉曲张 UGIB (NVUGIB),如胃糜烂或食管炎。在大多数情况下,急性期静脉曲张出血(急性静脉曲张出血,AVB)需要住院治疗,高度依赖紧急干预和重症监护监测。
更新日期:2020-03-18
down
wechat
bug