当前位置: X-MOL 学术JAMA › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Do Polygenic Risk Scores Improve Patient Selection for Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease?
JAMA ( IF 63.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-18 , DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.21667
Sadiya S Khan 1, 2 , Richard Cooper 3 , Philip Greenland 2, 4
Affiliation  

A risk-based prevention strategy is the most widely accepted approach to guide clinician-patient decision-making for prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). According to this approach, the intensity of prevention efforts is matched to the estimated risk of the individual.1 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines currently recommend pooled cohort equations for initial risk assessment, which integrate age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, and treatment for hypertension and diabetes to provide race- and sex-specific estimates of a broadly relevant end point of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk (myocardial infarction, death from coronary heart disease, and fatal or nonfatal stroke).2 While risk assessment for CAD is known to be an imprecise estimate,3 no other tests of cardiovascular risk are uniformly agreed to enhance risk stratification. Thus, the search for additional and better risk markers continues to be a focus of cardiovascular research.4,5



中文翻译:

多基因风险评分会改善预防冠状动脉疾病的患者选择吗?

基于风险的预防策略是最广泛接受的方法,可指导临床医生-患者决策以预防冠心病(CAD)。根据这种方法,将预防工作的强度与个人的估计风险相匹配。1美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南目前建议使用汇总队列方程式进行初始风险评估,该方程式综合了年龄,收缩压,总胆固醇,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,吸烟状况以及高血压和糖尿病的治疗方法,以提供种族以及与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(心肌梗塞,冠心病死亡,致命或非致命性中风)广泛相关的终点的性别特定估计值。2虽然已知对CAD的风险评估是不精确的估计,但3没有统一同意进行其他心血管风险测试以增强风险分层。因此,寻找更多和更好的危险标志物一直是心血管研究的重点。4 ,5

更新日期:2020-02-18
down
wechat
bug