Exploration of collaborative management implementation at two state wildlife agencies (SWAs) found that government fiscal accountability requirements create tensions that negatively impact collaborative plan implementation. Interview-derived insights highlight state policy misalignments between the support of collaborative governance and the application of governmental accountability controls. Tensions from this misalignment can negatively impact implementation and disrupt relationships among the SWA management staff, their partners, and their procurement staff. Rather than working as a part of a unified state interest to implement collaborative governance, procurement processes function as an internal regulatory authority that addresses different state policies. Informant comments identify dissimilar tension levels within the two SWAs, potentially due to the organizational location of procurement staffs. Confirmation of the influence of an SWA procurement staff organizational location on collaborative implementation requires further investigation. Tensions identified here likely exist in other natural resource management agencies and represent an understudied aspect of governmental collaborative management capacity often overlooked in collaborative planning and management scholarship.

中文翻译：

---

国家野生动物机构​​财政问责政策与协作管理实施之间的紧张关系

对两个州野生动物机构​​ (SWA) 的协作管理实施的探索发现，政府的财政问责要求会造成紧张局势，从而对协作计划的实施产生负面影响。访谈得出的见解突显了支持协作治理与应用政府问责制控制之间的国家政策失衡。这种不一致导致的紧张局势会对实施产生负面影响，并破坏 SWA 管理人员、他们的合作伙伴和他们的采购人员之间的关系。采购流程不是作为统一国家利益的一部分来实施协作治理，而是作为处理不同国家政策的内部监管机构。线人评论确定了两个 SWA 内不同的紧张程度，可能是由于采购人员的组织位置。确认 SWA 采购人员组织位置对协作实施的影响需要进一步调查。这里确定的紧张局势可能存在于其他自然资源管理机构中，并且代表了政府协作管理能力的一个未充分研究的方面，在协作规划和管理学术中经常被忽视。