Much has been written on how various issues unrelated to science can affect acceptance or rejection of your manuscripts, for instance in Acta Physiologica.[1, 2] For many, journal rankings are becoming a matter of feast or famine as national funding agencies assess scientific output to efficiently distribute their limited resources. Yet, how do agencies objectively value scientific output? There are several very different approaches.

中文翻译：

---

国家资助机构升级了生理生理学。

关于与科学无关的各种问题如何影响您的稿件的接受或拒绝的文章很多，[Acta Physiologica] [1，2]。随着国家资助机构对科学的评价，期刊排名正在成为一场盛宴或饥荒的问题输出以有效地分配其有限的资源。但是，机构如何客观地评估科学成果？有几种非常不同的方法。