当前位置: X-MOL 学术Bone Marrow Transpl. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of HLA-matched sibling and unrelated donor transplantation in adult patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia
Bone Marrow Transplantation ( IF 4.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-05 , DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0820-x
Seung Hwan Shin 1 , Sung Soo Park 2 , Jae Ho Yoon 2 , Seung Ah Yahng 3 , Sung Eun Lee 2 , Byung Sik Cho 2 , Ki Sung Eom 2 , Yoo Jin Kim 2 , Seok Lee 2 , Chang Ki Min 2 , Hee Je Kim 2 , Seok Goo Cho 2 , Jong Wook Lee 2
Affiliation  

The recent improvements in the outcomes of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from unrelated donors (URD) suggest the possibility of its alternative first-line treatment. To address this issue, results of adult SAA patients receiving allogeneic SCT were compared between the following three donor-type groups: 8/8–matched sibling (MSD; n = 153), 8/8 well-matched unrelated (WM-URD; n = 72), and 6–7/8 partially matched unrelated (PM-URD; n = 33). Proportion of patients who experienced immunosuppressive treatment failures was significantly higher in the URD groups than in the MSD group (P< 0.01). The incidences of graft failure and transplant-related mortality, and graft-vs.-host disease-free, failure-free survival rates of the MSD, WM-URD, and PM-URD groups were 14.6, 0, and 0% (P< 0.01); 6.1, 10.3, and 21.7% (P= 0.03); and 76.7, 55.5, and 51.5% (P< 0.01), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate of the MSD group (93.9%) was higher than that of the PM-URD (78.3%; P < 0.01) group, but not to that of the WM-URD (86.2%; P= 0.18) group. Our study showed comparable OS between the MSD group and WM-URD group, which suggest that the URD-SCT can be used as a first-line treatment for adult SAA patients with WM-URD.



中文翻译:

成人获得性重度再生障碍性贫血患者 HLA 匹配的兄弟姐妹和无关供者移植的比较

最近接受来自无关供者 (URD)​​ 的同种异体干细胞移植 (SCT) 的严重再生障碍性贫血 (SAA) 患者的结果的改善表明其替代一线治疗的可能性。为了解决这个问题,成人 SAA 患者接受同种异体 SCT 的结果在以下三个供体类型组之间进行了比较:8/8 匹配的兄弟姐妹(MSD;n  = 153),8/8 匹配良好的无关(WM-URD;n  = 72)和 6-7/8 部分匹配无关(PM-URD;n  = 33)。URD 组免疫抑制治疗失败的患者比例显着高于 MSD 组(P < 0.01)。MSD、WM-URD 和 PM-URD 组的移植物失败率和移植相关死亡率以及移植物抗宿主病、无失败生存率分别为 14.6%、0% 和 0%(P <  0.01); 6.1、10.3 和 21.7% ( P =  0.03);分别为76.7、55.5 和 51.5% ( P <  0.01)。MSD组的总生存率(93.9%)高于PM-URD组(78.3%;P  < 0.01),但不高于WM-URD组(86.2%;P =  0.18 ) ) 团体。我们的研究显示 MSD 组和 WM-URD 组的 OS 相当,这表明 URD-SCT 可用作 WM-URD 成人 SAA 患者的一线治疗。

更新日期:2020-02-05
down
wechat
bug