Multiple sensor nodes are required to gather the information and exchange the information in the direction of the sink node which makes a network. The static common node (NC) deployment has been work towards the coverage of deterministic territory. At that point, the coordinates of each regular node have been determined with the assistance of geometry of coverage locale. Among those basic nodes, on the off chance that one of the nodes gets fail, at that point, the coverage hole is made. To solve this issue, a viable alternate node (NA) deployment method has been presented for supplanting the damaged node. And furthermore developed quadrant based neighbor to sink and neighbor to source (Q-(NS) 2 ) routing protocol for lessening the superfluous flooding of ‘RREQ’ message to the majority of its neighbor while route discovery. A viable comparison has been done between this other node deployment procedure and references. The performance comparison has been done between Quadrant based Direct routing protocol (Q-DIR), Angle routing protocol (ARP) and Q-(NS) 2 routing protocol. Therefore, Q-(NS) 2 routing protocol decreases the pointless flooding of ‘RREQ’ to the greater part of its neighbor which implies it devours less energy for data packet delivery and no redundant node in N A deployment.

中文翻译：

---

WSN 的基于象限的邻居到宿和邻居到源路由协议和备用节点部署策略

需要多个传感器节点在汇聚节点的方向上收集信息并交换信息，从而形成一个网络。静态公共节点 (NC) 部署一直致力于覆盖确定性区域。在这一点上，每个规则节点的坐标已经在覆盖区域几何形状的帮助下确定。在这些基本节点中，如果其中一个节点发生故障，那么就会出现覆盖漏洞。为了解决这个问题，已经提出了一种可行的备用节点 (NA) 部署方法来替代损坏的节点。并且进一步开发了基于象限的邻居到宿和邻居到源(Q-(NS) 2 )路由协议，用于在路由发现时减少“RREQ”消息向其大多数邻居的多余泛洪。在此其他节点部署过程和参考之间进行了可行的比较。已经在基于象限的直接路由协议（Q-DIR）、角度路由协议（ARP）和Q-（NS）2路由协议之间进行了性能比较。因此，Q-(NS) 2 路由协议减少了“RREQ”到其邻居大部分区域的无意义洪泛，这意味着它消耗更少的能量来传输数据包，并且在 NA 部署中没有冗余节点。