当前位置: X-MOL 学术Fash. Text. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An evaluation of the suitability of fluorescent fabrics and retroreflective materials for road traffic warning clothing in compliance with international standards
Fashion and Textiles ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-05 , DOI: 10.1186/s40691-019-0190-4
Soonja Park

The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze physical properties of different fluorescent fabrics and retroreflective materials to determine their compliance to international standard for high-visibility warning clothing. Four fluorescent fabrics were selected for the study: a PET 71%/Cotton 23%/PU 6% fabric used in public road cleaner uniforms in Korea (S1), an ISO-compliant Japan-made PET 65%/Cotton 35% + conductive fabric (S2), and a randomly selected Korean-made PET 100% fabric for adults (S3) and children (S4). Selected samples were evaluated on their seven criteria in ISO 20471. Subsequently, luminance and retroreflective properties of four retroreflective materials were compared: a 3M (USA) plain sample (R1), a rectangular-patterned sample made by ‘R’ company (Korea) (R2), a plain sample also by ‘R’ (R3), and a random plain sample from a marketplace in Korea (R4). As a result, S1 was the most similar to ISO-compliant S2 and moisture regain could be improved by adjusting the cotton ratio or surface finishing. However, S3 and S4 seemed less suitable. Second, two bead type (R1, R4) and two prism type (R2, R3) retroreflective materials showed luminance in the order of R4 > R2 ≥ R1 > R3. General retroreflective properties and post-5-condition retroreflective properties of all four samples were ISO-compliant, and the retroreflective property at observation angle of 12′ and incidence angle of 5° of R2, R3, and R4 against R1 ranged between 81.4% and 158.4%. Despite the variance, all four samples were ISO-compliant and suggest that R2, R3, and R4 are possible materials for export.

中文翻译:

根据国际标准对荧光纤维和逆向反射材料在道路交通警告服上的适用性进行评估

这项研究的目的是比较和分析不同荧光织物和回射材料的物理性能,以确定它们是否符合高可见度警告服装的国际标准。本研究选择了四种荧光织物:用于韩国公共道路清洁工制服的PET 71%/棉23%/ PU 6%织物,日本生产的符合ISO标准的PET 65%/棉35%+导电性面料(S2),以及随机选择的韩国制PET 100%面料,用于成人(S3)和儿童(S4)。所选样品按照ISO 20471中的七个标准进行评估。随后,比较了四种回射材料的亮度和回射特性:3M(美国)普通样品(R1),'R'公司(韩国)制造的矩形图案样品(R2),同样是'R'(R3)的普通样本,以及来自韩国市场(R4)的随机普通样本。结果,S1与符合ISO标准的S2最相似,可以通过调整棉比例或表面处理来提高回潮率。但是,S3和S4似乎不太合适。其次,两种珠子类型(R1,R4)和两种棱镜类型(R2,R3)逆反射材料显示出亮度为R4>R2≥R1> R3。所有四个样品的一般逆向反射性能和5条件后逆向反射性能均符合ISO标准,R2,R3和R4对R1的观察角为12',入射角为5°时的逆向反射率在81.4%和158.4%。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。S1与符合ISO标准的S2最相似,可以通过调整棉比例或表面处理来提高回潮率。但是,S3和S4似乎不太合适。其次,两种珠型(R1,R4)和两种棱镜型(R2,R3)的逆反射材料显示出的亮度为R4>R2≥R1> R3。所有四个样品的一般逆向反射性能和5条件后逆向反射性能均符合ISO标准,R2,R3和R4对R1的观察角为12',入射角为5°时的逆向反射率在81.4%和158.4%。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。S1与符合ISO标准的S2最相似,可以通过调整棉比例或表面处理来提高回潮率。但是,S3和S4似乎不太合适。其次,两种珠型(R1,R4)和两种棱镜型(R2,R3)的逆反射材料显示出的亮度为R4>R2≥R1> R3。所有四个样品的一般逆向反射性能和5条件后逆向反射性能均符合ISO标准,R2,R3和R4对R1的观察角为12',入射角为5°时的逆向反射率在81.4%和158.4%。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。S3和S4似乎不太合适。其次,两种珠型(R1,R4)和两种棱镜型(R2,R3)的逆反射材料显示出的亮度为R4>R2≥R1> R3。所有四个样品的一般逆向反射性能和5条件后逆向反射性能均符合ISO标准,R2,R3和R4对R1的观察角为12',入射角为5°时的逆向反射率在81.4%和158.4%。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。S3和S4似乎不太合适。其次,两种珠型(R1,R4)和两种棱镜型(R2,R3)的逆反射材料显示出的亮度为R4>R2≥R1> R3。所有四个样品的一般逆向反射性能和5条件后逆向反射性能均符合ISO标准,R2,R3和R4对R1的观察角为12',入射角为5°时的逆向反射率在81.4%和158.4%。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。R2,R3和R4相对于R1的观察角为12°,入射角为5°时的回射特性在81.4%至158.4%之间。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。R2,R3和R4相对于R1的观察角为12°,入射角为5°时的回射特性在81.4%至158.4%之间。尽管存在差异,但所有四个样本均符合ISO标准,并建议R2,R3和R4可能是出口材料。
更新日期:2019-12-05
down
wechat
bug