当前位置: X-MOL 学术Clin. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Predicting outcomes for anxious children receiving group cognitive-behavioural therapy: Does the type of anxiety diagnosis make a difference?
Clinical Psychologist ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2018-11-01 , DOI: 10.1111/cp.12128
Allison M. Waters 1 , Trisha A. Groth 1 , Helena Purkis 1 , Clair Alston-knox 2
Affiliation  

Background Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is an efficacious treatment for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents, yet not all young people improve. Understanding predictors of treatment response can inform treatment improvements in order to enhance outcomes. Aim The purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes following group-based CBT for children with different anxiety disorders (social phobia (SocP), separation anxiety disorder (SAD), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), specific phobia (SP)) to determine whether differential outcomes from group-based CBT are related to type of diagnosis. Method Participants were 205 clinically anxious children between 4 and 12 years of age. Treatment outcomes were assessed using clinician-rated diagnostic interviews, parent-report, and child-report symptom measures. Ninety-seven children completed a long-term follow-up assessment 6 or 12 months after treatment. Results Children with a principal diagnosis of SocP and GAD had a poorer post-treatment outcome compared to children with a principal diagnosis of SP and SAD. Poorer outcomes persisted in children with a principal diagnosis of SocP by the follow-up assessment compared to children with the other anxiety disorders. Conclusions These findings are consistent with recent studies that have found poorer outcomes from CBT for youth and adults with SocP, and emphasise the need for further research into treatments that target specific factors that could improve outcomes.

中文翻译:

预测接受团体认知行为疗法的焦虑儿童的结果:焦虑症的诊断类型是否有所不同?

背景 认知行为疗法 (CBT) 是治疗儿童和青少年焦虑症的有效方法,但并非所有年轻人都有所改善。了解治疗反应的预测因素可以为治疗改进提供信息,以提高结果。目的 本研究的目的是比较不同焦虑症(社交恐惧症 (SocP)、分离焦虑症 (SAD)、广泛性焦虑症 (GAD)、特定恐惧症 (SP))儿童在基于群体的 CBT 后的治疗结果,确定基于群体的 CBT 的差异结果是否与诊断类型有关。方法 参与者是 205 名 4 至 12 岁的临床焦虑儿童。使用临床医生评定的诊断访谈、家长报告和儿童报告的症状措施评估治疗结果。97 名儿童在治疗后 6 或 12 个月完成了长期随访评估。结果 与主要诊断为 SP 和 SAD 的儿童相比,主要诊断为 SocP 和 GAD 的儿童的治疗后结果较差。与其他焦虑症儿童相比,随访评估主要诊断为 SocP 的儿童预后较差。结论 这些发现与最近的研究一致,这些研究发现 CBT 对患有 SocP 的青年和成人的结果较差,并强调需要进一步研究针对可以改善结果的特定因素的治疗。结果 与主要诊断为 SP 和 SAD 的儿童相比,主要诊断为 SocP 和 GAD 的儿童的治疗后结果较差。与其他焦虑症儿童相比,随访评估主要诊断为 SocP 的儿童预后较差。结论 这些发现与最近的研究一致,这些研究发现 CBT 对患有 SocP 的青年和成人的结果较差,并强调需要进一步研究针对可以改善结果的特定因素的治疗。结果 与主要诊断为 SP 和 SAD 的儿童相比,主要诊断为 SocP 和 GAD 的儿童的治疗后结果较差。与其他焦虑症儿童相比,随访评估主要诊断为 SocP 的儿童预后较差。结论 这些发现与最近的研究一致,这些研究发现 CBT 对患有 SocP 的青年和成人的结果较差,并强调需要进一步研究针对可以改善结果的特定因素的治疗。
更新日期:2018-11-01
down
wechat
bug