当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Braz. Comput. Soc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: a systematic review
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society Pub Date : 2019-02-04 , DOI: 10.1186/s13173-019-0084-8
Manoela M. O. da Silva , João Marcelo X. N. Teixeira , Patrícia S. Cavalcante , Veronica Teichrieb

Education has benefited from augmented reality’s (AR) potential to promote interactive experiences both inside and outside the classroom. A systematic review was conducted on how AR’s impact in the learning process has been evaluated. We selected papers from 2009 to 2017 in three databases, IEEE, ACM, and Science Direct, using an open-source crawler, and in one Brazilian Conference, SBIE. We followed the PRISMA protocol. Forty-five works were selected and used to extract data for our research. They were also analyzed according to quantitative and qualitative criteria. The results from all the papers are available in an online database. Results evidenced an increase in the number of papers evaluating the AR’s impact in education. They also showed that AR has been applied in different areas and contexts. Most papers reported positive outcomes as a result of AR insertion. However, most studies lacked the involvement of the teacher and the use of multiple metrics to evaluate educational gains.

中文翻译:

如何评估用于教育的增强现实技术工具的观点:系统评价

教育受益于增强现实 (AR) 的潜力,可以促进课堂内外的互动体验。对 AR 在学习过程中的影响进行了系统评价。我们使用开源爬虫在三个数据库(IEEE、ACM 和 Science Direct)以及一个巴西会议 SBIE 中选择了 2009 年至 2017 年的论文。我们遵循 PRISMA 协议。选择了 45 部作品并用于提取我们研究的数据。还根据定量和定性标准对它们进行了分析。所有论文的结果都可以在在线数据库中找到。结果表明,评估 AR 对教育影响的论文数量有所增加。他们还表明 AR 已应用于不同的领域和环境。大多数论文报告了 AR 插入的积极结果。然而,大多数研究缺乏教师的参与和使用多种指标来评估教育成果。
更新日期:2019-02-04
down
wechat
bug