Uncovering attacks on data and computer systems and those responsible for them is one of the contemporary problems that the authorities involved in criminal proceedings have to deal with. Where this sort of cybercrime is concerned we can expect not only high levels of latency but also a low clear-up rate for crimes on file. This paper demonstrates this using the example of the Czech Republic, by providing an analysis of all cases of this type of cybercrime dealt with by courts between 2008 and 2016. It focuses in particular on proceedings concerned with illegal access and data and system interference. The cybercrimes that are brought to court in the Czech Republic is not representative of the cybercrime committed in the Czech Republic either in terms of its type or its extent. The cases dealt with by the courts are primarily connected with personal relationships and the Internet. The most frequent type of case thus concerns the misuse of passwords for accessing social networking sites or e-mail inboxes. We were also surprised to find that the courts had begun to apply facts relevant to cybercrime cases in cases involving the manual manipulation of gambling machines. The Czech Republic has evidently not yet found a way of demonstrating criminals’ guilt in more complex cybercrime cases.

揭露对数据和计算机系统以及对其负责的人的攻击，是刑事诉讼当局必须处理的当代问题之一。在涉及这种网络犯罪的地方，我们不仅可以期待高水平的延迟，而且可以期待较低的犯罪记录清除率。本文以捷克共和国为例，通过对法院在2008年至2016年间处理的所有此类网络犯罪案件进行分析，来证明这一点。它特别关注与非法访问，数据和系统干扰有关的诉讼。就其类型或程度而言，在捷克共和国被起诉的网络犯罪并不代表在捷克共和国所犯的网络犯罪。法院处理的案件主要与人际关系和互联网有关。因此，最常见的案件类型涉及滥用密码访问社交网站或电子邮件收件箱。我们还惊奇地发现，在涉及手动操纵赌博机的案件中，法院已开始运用与网络犯罪案件有关的事实。捷克共和国显然还没有找到在更复杂的网络犯罪案件中证明罪犯有罪的方法。