当前位置: X-MOL 学术Geosci. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Factors controlling the geochemical differences between two types of rhyolites in the middle Okinawa Trough
Geosciences Journal ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-08-10 , DOI: 10.1007/s12303-018-0084-2
Yuxiang Zhang , Zhigang Zeng , Xiaoyuan Wang , Shuai Chen , Xuebo Yin

The origin of the felsic volcanic rocks in the Okinawa Trough (OT) remains uncertain. In the middle Okinawa Trough (MOT), two types of rhyolites (type 1 and type 2 rhyolites) have been recognized. Research on the diverse volcanic rocks should be prioritized to determine the magmatic origins of these rocks. Consequently, in this article, the geochemical differences and controlling factors for these two types of MOT rhyolites are systematically discussed. Type 2 rhyolites have higher Dy/Yb and Nb/Ta ratios than type 1 rhyolites, implying that the former might be influenced by a greater contribution of amphibole. Quantitative models suggest that type 1 rhyolites could have formed via the remelting of andesites when amphiboles remain in the source, whereas type 2 rhyolites could have formed without residual amphiboles. These two distinct melting models effectively explain most discrepancies between the major and trace element compositions of type 1 and 2 rhyolites. Additionally, the lower Mg# and δEu values of type 2 rhyolites are partly caused by significant magmatic differentiation. Quasi-linear correlations between some major oxides, trace element ratios and Sr-Nd isotopic ratios for type 2 rhyolites suggest that these rhyolites might have been contaminated by crustal rocks or melts with compositions similar to those of the Kueishantao (KST) andesites or the Middle Miocene upper crustal rocks of SW Japan. Therefore, isotopically enriched crustal materials likely remain in the OT crust.

中文翻译:

控制冲绳中槽两种流纹岩之间地球化学差异的因素

冲绳海槽(OT)的长英质火山岩的起源仍不确定。在冲绳海槽中部(MOT),已经认识到两种类型的流纹岩(1型和2型流纹岩)。应该优先研究各种火山岩,以确定这些岩浆的岩浆成因。因此,本文系统地讨论了这两种类型的MOT流纹岩的地球化学差异和控制因素。2型流纹岩比1型流纹岩具有更高的Dy / Yb和Nb / Ta比,这意味着前者可能受到闪石的更大贡献。定量模型表明,当源中存在闪石时,可能通过安山岩的重熔形成了1型流纹岩,而2种流纹岩可能没有残留的双闪石形成了。这两个不同的熔解模型有效地解释了1型和2型流纹岩的主要元素和微量元素组成之间的大多数差异。此外,类型2流纹岩的Mg#和δEu值较低,部分原因是岩浆明显分化。2型流纹岩的一些主要氧化物,微量元素比率和Sr-Nd同位素比率之间的拟线性关系表明,这些流纹岩可能已被地壳岩石或熔体污染,其组成与快山涛(KST)安山岩或中山岩相似。日本西南部中新世上地壳岩。因此,同位素富集的地壳物质可能保留在OT地壳中。2型流纹岩的Mg#和δEu较低,部分原因是岩浆明显分化。2型流纹岩的一些主要氧化物,痕量元素比率和Sr-Nd同位素比率之间的拟线性关系表明,这些流纹岩可能已被地壳岩石或熔体污染,其组成类似于奎山陶(KST)安山岩或中山岩。日本西南部中新世上地壳岩。因此,同位素富集的地壳物质可能保留在OT地壳中。2型流纹岩的Mg#和δEu较低,部分原因是岩浆明显分化。2型流纹岩的一些主要氧化物,痕量元素比率和Sr-Nd同位素比率之间的拟线性关系表明,这些流纹岩可能已被地壳岩石或熔体污染,其组成类似于奎山陶(KST)安山岩或中山岩。日本西南部中新世上地壳岩。因此,同位素富集的地壳物质可能保留在OT地壳中。2型流纹岩的微量元素比率和Sr-Nd同位素比率表明,这些流纹岩可能已被地壳岩石或熔体污染,其成分类似于日本西南部的龟山桃(KST)安山岩或中新世中地壳。因此,同位素富集的地壳物质可能保留在OT地壳中。2型流纹岩的微量元素比率和Sr-Nd同位素比率表明,这些流纹岩可能已被地壳岩石或熔体污染,其成分类似于日本西南部的龟山桃(KST)安山岩或中新世中地壳。因此,同位素富集的地壳物质可能保留在OT地壳中。
更新日期:2019-08-10
down
wechat
bug