The incorporation of multiple types of knowledge (e.g., science, Indigenous knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge) is an important undertaking, which can strengthen the evidence-base for policy advice, decision making, and environmental management. While the benefits of incorporating multiple types of knowledge in environmental research and management are many, successfully doing so has remained a challenge. In response there has been a number of recent reviews that have sought to better understand the what and how, when it comes to bridging Indigenous and science-based knowledge. Yet there continues to be a need for methods, models, and approaches for integrative work. This systematic map seeks to examine the extent, range, and nature of the published literature (i.e., peer-reviewed and grey) that integrates and/or includes Indigenous and science-based knowledge in coastal-marine research, monitoring, or management in Canada. Results from this study can be used to inform new and ongoing research and monitoring efforts and highlight evidence gaps. The systematic map will aim to capture all available studies relevant to the question found in the peer-reviewed and grey literature. Accordingly, the search will leverage four databases focused on peer reviewed publications, carefully selected specialist websites, and two web-based search engines. Reference sections of relevant review articles will also be cross-checked to identify articles that were not found using the search strategy. All searches will be conducted in English. Search results will be reviewed in two stages: (1) title and abstract; and (2) full text. All screening decisions will be included in the database. The systematic map will employ a narrative synthesis approach that will include the use of descriptive statistics, tables (including SM database), and figures (including map with the studies geospatially referenced). In addition, an online version of the map and queryable database will be developed similar to other knowledge mobilization tools.

中文翻译：

---

在加拿大沿海海洋研究，监测和管理中融合土著和基于科学的知识：系统的地图协议

纳入多种类型的知识（例如，科学，土著知识，传统生态知识）是一项重要的工作，可以增强政策建议，决策和环境管理的证据基础。尽管将多种类型的知识纳入环境研究和管理的好处很多，但成功做到这一点仍然是一个挑战。作为回应，最近有许多评论试图更好地理解在桥接土著和基于科学的知识方面的内容和方式。然而，仍然需要用于集成工作的方法，模型和方法。此系统地图旨在检查已发表文献的范围，范围和性质（即，同行评审和灰色），在加拿大沿海海洋研究，监测或管理中整合和/或包括基于土著和基于科学的知识。这项研究的结果可用于为正在进行的新研究和监测工作提供信息，并突出证据空白。该系统地图旨在捕获与同行评审的灰色文献中发现的问题相关的所有可用研究。因此，搜索将利用四个数据库，这些数据库侧重于同行评审的出版物，精心选择的专业网站以及两个基于Web的搜索引擎。相关评论文章的参考部分也将经过交叉检查，以识别使用搜索策略未找到的文章。所有搜索将以英语进行。搜索结果将分两个阶段进行审查：（1）标题和摘要；（2）全文。所有筛选决定都将包括在数据库中。系统地图将采用叙述性综合方法，其中将包括使用描述性统计数据，表格（包括SM数据库）和图形（包括具有地理空间参考的研究的地图）。此外，将开发类似于其他知识动员工具的在线地图和可查询数据库。