当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
3D Printed Microfluidics.
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-12 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-091619-102649
Anna V Nielsen 1 , Michael J Beauchamp 1 , Gregory P Nordin 2 , Adam T Woolley 1
Affiliation  

Traditional microfabrication techniques suffer from several disadvantages, including the inability to create truly three-dimensional (3D) architectures, expensive and time-consuming processes when changing device designs, and difficulty in transitioning from prototyping fabrication to bulk manufacturing. 3D printing is an emerging technique that could overcome these disadvantages. While most 3D printed fluidic devices and features to date have been on the millifluidic size scale, some truly microfluidic devices have been shown. Currently, stereolithography is the most promising approach for routine creation of microfluidic structures, but several approaches under development also have potential. Microfluidic 3D printing is still in an early stage, similar to where polydimethylsiloxane was two decades ago. With additional work to advance printer hardware and software control, expand and improve resin and printing material selections, and realize additional applications for 3D printed devices, we foresee 3D printing becoming the dominant microfluidic fabrication method.

中文翻译:



3D 打印微流体。



传统的微制造技术存在多个缺点,包括无法创建真正的三维 (3D) 架构、改变器件设计时的流程昂贵且耗时,以及从原型制造过渡到批量制造困难。 3D打印是一种可以克服这些缺点的新兴技术。虽然迄今为止大多数 3D 打印流体设备和功能都处于微流体尺寸范围内,但一些真正的微流体设备已经被展示。目前,立体光刻是常规创建微流体结构最有前途的方法,但正在开发的几种方法也具有潜力。微流控 3D 打印仍处于早期阶段,类似于二十年前的聚二甲基硅氧烷。通过进一步推进打印机硬件和软件控制、扩展和改进树脂和打印材料选择以及实现 3D 打印设备的其他应用,我们预计 3D 打印将成为主要的微流体制造方法。

更新日期:2020-06-12
down
wechat
bug