当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Eur. Radiol. Exp.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ultrasound-guided interventions with augmented reality in situ visualisation: a proof-of-mechanism phantom study.
European Radiology Experimental ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-04 , DOI: 10.1186/s41747-019-0129-y Nadja A Farshad-Amacker 1 , Till Bay 2 , Andrea B Rosskopf 1 , José M Spirig 3 , Florian Wanivenhaus 3 , Christian W A Pfirrmann 1 , Mazda Farshad 3
中文翻译:
超声引导介入与增强现实技术在原位可视化:机制的幻像研究。
更新日期:2020-02-04
European Radiology Experimental ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-04 , DOI: 10.1186/s41747-019-0129-y Nadja A Farshad-Amacker 1 , Till Bay 2 , Andrea B Rosskopf 1 , José M Spirig 3 , Florian Wanivenhaus 3 , Christian W A Pfirrmann 1 , Mazda Farshad 3
Affiliation
Background
Ultrasound (US) images are currently displayed on monitors, and their understanding needs good orientation skills. Direct overlay of US images onto the according anatomy is possible with augmented reality (AR) technologies. Our purpose was to explore the performance of US-guided needle placement with and without AR in situ US viewing.Methods
Three untrained operators and two experienced radiologists performed 200 US-guided punctures: 100 with and 100 without AR in situ US. The punctures were performed in two different phantoms, a leg phantom with soft tissue lesions and a vessel phantom. Time to puncture and number of needle passes were recorded for each puncture. Data are reported as median [range] according to their non-normal distribution.Results
AR in situ US resulted in reduced time (median [range], 13 s [3–101] versus 14 s [3–220]) and number of needle passes (median [range], 1 [1–4] versus 1 [1–8]) compared to the conventional technique. The initial gap in performance of untrained versus experienced operators with the conventional US (time, 21.5 s [3–220] versus 10.5 s [3–94] and needle passes 1 [1–8] versus 1 [1, 2]) was reduced to 12.5 s [3–101] versus 13 s [3–100] and 1 [1–4] versus 1 [1–4] when using AR in situ US, respectively.Conclusion
AR in situ US could be a potential breakthrough in US applications by simplifying operator’s spatial orientation and reducing experience-based differences in performance of US-guided interventions. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary phantom results.中文翻译:
超声引导介入与增强现实技术在原位可视化:机制的幻像研究。