当前位置: X-MOL 学术N. Engl. J. Med. › 论文详情
Conservative versus Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax.
The New England Journal of Medicine ( IF 70.670 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-30 , DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1910775
Simon G A Brown,Emma L Ball,Kyle Perrin,Stephen E Asha,Irene Braithwaite,Diana Egerton-Warburton,Peter G Jones,Gerben Keijzers,Frances B Kinnear,Ben C H Kwan,K V Lam,Y C Gary Lee,Mike Nowitz,Catherine A Read,Graham Simpson,Julian A Smith,Quentin A Summers,Mark Weatherall,Richard Beasley,

BACKGROUND Whether conservative management is an acceptable alternative to interventional management for uncomplicated, moderate-to-large primary spontaneous pneumothorax is unknown. METHODS In this open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial, we recruited patients 14 to 50 years of age with a first-known, unilateral, moderate-to-large primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Patients were randomly assigned to immediate interventional management of the pneumothorax (intervention group) or a conservative observational approach (conservative-management group) and were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was lung reexpansion within 8 weeks. RESULTS A total of 316 patients underwent randomization (154 patients to the intervention group and 162 to the conservative-management group). In the conservative-management group, 25 patients (15.4%) underwent interventions to manage the pneumothorax, for reasons prespecified in the protocol, and 137 (84.6%) did not undergo interventions. In a complete-case analysis in which data were not available for 23 patients in the intervention group and 37 in the conservative-management group, reexpansion within 8 weeks occurred in 129 of 131 patients (98.5%) with interventional management and in 118 of 125 (94.4%) with conservative management (risk difference, -4.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.6 to 0.5; P = 0.02 for noninferiority); the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval was within the prespecified noninferiority margin of -9 percentage points. In a sensitivity analysis in which all missing data after 56 days were imputed as treatment failure (with reexpansion in 129 of 138 patients [93.5%] in the intervention group and in 118 of 143 [82.5%] in the conservative-management group), the risk difference of -11.0 percentage points (95% CI, -18.4 to -3.5) was outside the prespecified noninferiority margin. Conservative management resulted in a lower risk of serious adverse events or pneumothorax recurrence than interventional management. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary outcome was not statistically robust to conservative assumptions about missing data, the trial provides modest evidence that conservative management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax was noninferior to interventional management, with a lower risk of serious adverse events. (Funded by the Emergency Medicine Foundation and others; PSP Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12611000184976.).
更新日期:2020-01-29

 

全部期刊列表>>
宅家赢大奖
向世界展示您的会议墙报和演示文稿
全球疫情及响应:BMC Medicine专题征稿
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
化学材料学全球高引用
ACS材料视界
x-mol收录
自然科研论文编辑服务
南方科技大学
南方科技大学
西湖大学
中国科学院长春应化所于聪-4-8
复旦大学
课题组网站
X-MOL
深圳大学二维材料实验室张晗
中山大学化学工程与技术学院
试剂库存
天合科研
down
wechat
bug