当前位置: X-MOL 学术Nat. Hum. Behav. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Discussion points for Bayesian inference.
Nature Human Behaviour ( IF 21.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-27 , DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
Balazs Aczel 1 , Rink Hoekstra 2 , Andrew Gelman 3 , Eric-Jan Wagenmakers 4 , Irene G Klugkist 5 , Jeffrey N Rouder 6 , Joachim Vandekerckhove 6 , Michael D Lee 6 , Richard D Morey 7 , Wolf Vanpaemel 8 , Zoltan Dienes 9 , Don van Ravenzwaaij 2
Affiliation  

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

中文翻译:

贝叶斯推理的讨论要点。

为什么没有达成共识的进行贝叶斯分析的方法?我们在关于贝叶斯推理的几个讨论点上提供了作者的同意和不同意见的摘要。我们还提供了一个思维指南,以协助研究人员在社会科学和行为科学中进行贝叶斯推理。
更新日期:2020-01-27
down
wechat
bug