当前位置: X-MOL 学术Remote Sens. Environ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Mapping nature's contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales
Remote Sensing of Environment ( IF 11.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111671
Mark Mulligan , Arnout van Soesbergen , David G. Hole , Thomas M. Brooks , Sophia Burke , Jon Hutton

Abstract The natural world has multiple, sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic, values to society when viewed through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Spatial mapping of nature's contributions to the SDGs has the potential to support the implementation of SDG strategies through sustainable land management and conservation of ecosystem services. Such mapping requires a range of spatial data. This paper examines the use of remote sensing and spatial ecosystem service modelling to examine nature's contribution to targets under SDG 6, also highlighting synergies with other key SDGs and trade-offs with agriculture. We use a wide range of remotely sensed and globally available datasets (for land cover, climate, soil, population, agriculture) alongside the existing and widely used spatial ecosystem services assessment tool, Co$tingNature. With these we identify priority areas for sustainable management to realise targets under SDG 6 (water) at the country scale for Madagascar and at the basin scale for the Volta basin, though the application developed can be applied to any country or major basin in the world. Within this SDG 6 priority areas footprint, we assess the synergies and trade-offs provided by this land for SDG 15 (biodiversity) and SDG 13 (climate action) as well as SDG 2 (zero hunger). Results highlight the co-benefits of sustainably managing nature's contribution to SDG 6, such as the protection of forest cover (for SDG target 15.2), carbon storage as a contribution to the Paris climate agreement and nationally determined contributions (SDG 13) and biodiversity (for SDG target 15.5) but also trade-offs with the zero hunger goal (for SDG 2). Such analyses allow for better understanding of land management requirements for realising multiple SDGs through protection and restoration of green infrastructure. We provide a freely available tool, within the Co$tingNature platform, based on a variety of remotely sensed products, that can be used by SDG practitioners to carry out similar analyses and inform decision-making at national or sub-national levels globally.

中文翻译:

绘制自然对可持续发展目标 6 的贡献以及在政策相关尺度上对其他可持续发展目标的影响

摘要 从可持续发展目标 (SDG) 的角度来看,自然世界对社会具有多重、有时相互冲突、有时具有协同作用的价值观,自然对可持续发展目标的贡献的空间图有可能通过可持续发展支持可持续发展目标战略的实施。土地管理和生态系统服务保护。这种映射需要一定范围的空间数据。本文研究了使用遥感和空间生态系统服务建模来检查自然对可持续发展目标 6 下目标的贡献,还强调了与其他关键可持续发展目标的协同作用以及与农业的权衡。我们使用广泛的遥感和全球可用数据集(土地覆盖、气候、土壤、人口、农业)以及现有和广泛使用的空间生态系统服务评估工具 Co$tingNature。通过这些,我们确定了可持续管理的优先领域,以实现马达加斯加国家级和沃尔特盆地流域规模的可持续发展目标 6(水)下的目标,尽管开发的应用程序可应用于世界上任何国家或主要流域. 在这个 SDG 6 优先领域足迹内,我们评估了这片土地为 SDG 15(生物多样性)和 SDG 13(气候行动)以及 SDG 2(零饥饿)提供的协同作用和权衡。结果突出了可持续管理自然对可持续发展目标 6 的贡献的共同利益,例如保护森林覆盖(针对可持续发展目标具体目标 15.2),碳储存作为对巴黎气候协议和国家自主贡献(可持续发展目标 13)和生物多样性(可持续发展目标 15.5)的贡献,但也与零饥饿目标(可持续发展目标 2)进行权衡。此类分析有助于更好地了解通过保护和恢复绿色基础设施来实现多个可持续发展目标的土地管理要求。我们在 Co$tingNature 平台内提供了一个基于各种遥感产品的免费工具,可持续发展目标从业者可以使用这些工具在全球的国家或次国家层面进行类似的分析并为决策提供信息。此类分析有助于更好地了解通过保护和恢复绿色基础设施来实现多个可持续发展目标的土地管理要求。我们在 Co$tingNature 平台内提供了一个基于各种遥感产品的免费工具,可持续发展目标从业者可以使用这些工具在全球的国家或次国家层面进行类似的分析并为决策提供信息。此类分析有助于更好地了解通过保护和恢复绿色基础设施来实现多个可持续发展目标的土地管理要求。我们在 Co$tingNature 平台内提供了一个基于各种遥感产品的免费工具,可持续发展目标从业者可以使用这些工具在全球的国家或次国家层面进行类似的分析并为决策提供信息。
更新日期:2020-03-01
down
wechat
bug