当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Discharges, Poor-Performer Quits, and Layoffs as Valued Exits: Is It Really Addition by Subtraction?
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior ( IF 14.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-21 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343
Charlie O. Trevor 1 , Rakoon Piyanontalee 1
Affiliation  

We contend that a variety of types of employee exits from the firm are presumed to be a net positive and are thus valued by management, resulting in a potentially important new way to think about these leavers. For each of three valued exit (VE) types (discharges, poor-performer quits, and layoffs) we examine incidence, construct similarities and differences, and antecedents. We also summarize and critique the literature on VE consequences for the organization. In doing so we discuss how an underlying tension must accompany the analysis of VEs. Specifically, the intuitive notion of addition by subtraction must be considered relative to important contextual considerations and to evidence that the operational disruption created by VE departures may at times mitigate or even outweigh the VE benefits. Underlying our analysis is the stipulation that the formal consideration of VEs is in its infancy and is thus laden with conceptual and methodological challenges that scholars must address if we are to benefit from this new approach to employee exits from the firm.

中文翻译:


出院,绩效不佳和裁员是重要的退出:减法真的是加法吗?

我们认为,各种类型的员工离职被假定为净正薪资,因此被管理层重视,从而产生了一种潜在的重要方式来思考这些离职人员。对于三种有价值的退出(VE)类型(放电,执行不佳的退出和裁员),我们都会检查发生率,构造的异同和前因。我们还将总结和批评有关VE对组织的影响的文献。在此过程中,我们讨论了潜在压力如何伴随对VE的分析。具体而言,必须相对于重要的上下文考虑因素考虑减法加法的直观概念,并证明由VE离开造成的运营中断有时可能会减轻甚至超过VE的收益。

更新日期:2020-04-21
down
wechat
bug