We read with interest “Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK” by Ozulken et al.1 Eyes with 0.75 diopters or greater magnitude difference between clinically measured manifest refractive astigmatism and Contoura-measured anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) and 10° or less axis difference received Contoura treatment (WaveLight Contoura; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), whereas contralateral eyes without these criteria were excluded from Contoura treatment and received wavefront-optimized (WFO) treatment. This

中文翻译：

---

地形引导下消融靶向角膜前散光可忽略眼部残余散光，导致结果差。

我们感兴趣地阅读了Ozulken等人的“在LASIK中使用LYRA协议进行波前优化消融和地形引导的Contoura消融的比较”1。临床测量的明显屈光散光与Contoura测量的前角膜散光之间存在0.75屈光度或更大幅度的眼（ACA）和10°或更小的轴差接受Contoura治疗（WaveLight Contoura; Alcon Laboratories，Inc.，Fort Worth，TX），而没有这些标准的对侧眼睛则排除在Contoura治疗之外，并接受波前优化（WFO）治疗。这个