The conducted researches have shown that the features of the housing and communal sector do not allow talking about the possibility of calculating the “optimal” tariff rate. The development of an effective method of tariff formation for rural areas is particularly acute. The use of traditional method to calculate the amount of tariffs for housing and communal services provided to the population and enterprises (called “cost plus” approach) consists in a simple summation of the cost price of a service with a premium that was set directly by a particular housing and communal enterprise within the maximum and minimum values. The authors found that none of the current pricing and tariffs’ setting methods fulfills the requirements for an effective and economically founded tariff policy in the housing and communal services sector. In this regard, the development of a new methodology that will ensure the receipt of compromise tariffs for housing and communal services is required. Compromise analysis, the main purpose of which is to obtain optimal prices, can be used as a basis of such methodology.

进行的研究表明，住房和公共部门的特点不允许谈论计算“最佳”关税税率的可能性。为农村地区开发一种有效的关税形成方法尤为紧迫。使用传统方法计算向居民和企业提供的住房和公共服务的关税金额（称为“成本加成”方法）包括将服务的成本价格与由直接设定的溢价的简单总和最大值和最小值范围内的特定住房和公共企业。作者发现，目前的定价和关税设置方法都不能满足住房和公共服务部门有效且经济上建立的关税政策的要求。在这方面，需要制定一种新的方法，以确保收到住房和公共服务的折衷关税。折衷分析的主要目的是获得最优价格，可以用作这种方法的基础。