BACKGROUND The workplace environment potentially provides access to a large population who are employed, and it is an employer's responsibility to provide appropriate conditions for its employees. Whilst the aetiology of cardiovascular disease is multifactorial, it is generally acknowledged that working conditions, gender and age are involved in its development. Male-dominated industries (comprising > 70% male workers, e.g., agriculture, construction, manufacturing, mining, transport and technology) have a higher prevalence of health risk behaviours than other population subgroups. Working in a gender-dominated industry can impact an employee's health and wellbeing, particularly for the opposite sex. This systematic review examines workplace interventions that address the health and wellbeing of employees in male-dominated industries. METHODS We will include randomised controlled trials and studies with non-randomised intervention groups. The interventions must aim to improve employee physical and/or mental health and wellbeing implemented in the workplace in male-dominated industries. There will be no limits on date. The following electronic databases will be searched for published studies: Web of Science, Embed, MedLine, PsycInfo and the Cochrane Database. The search strategy will include free-text terms and MeSH vocabulary, including 'male-dominated industries', 'workplace interventions', 'occupational stress', 'mental health', 'cardiovascular disease', 'blood pressure', 'body mass index' and 'exercise'. Two authors will independently select, review and extract data from studies that meet the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool will be used to assess risk of bias. We will perform structured summaries of the included studies and, if possible, conduct meta-analyses or construct an Albatross plot. DISCUSSION There are an increasing number of interventions designed to improve employee health and wellbeing in the workplace, but no prior review that systematically evaluates their effectiveness. A systematic review is required to prioritise the future implementation of those interventions found to be most effective. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019161283.

中文翻译：

---

一项系统审查协议，审查旨在改善男性主导行业员工健康和福祉的工作场所干预措施。


背景技术工作场所环境潜在地为大量就业人口提供了机会，并且雇主有责任为其雇员提供适当的条件。虽然心血管疾病的病因是多因素的，但人们普遍认为工作条件、性别和年龄与其发展有关。男性主导的行业（男性工人比例超过 70%，例如农业、建筑、制造、采矿、运输和技术）的健康风险行为的发生率高于其他人群。在性别主导的行业工作可能会影响员工的健康和福祉，尤其是异性。这项系统审查研究了解决男性主导行业员工健康和福祉的工作场所干预措施。方法 我们将纳入随机对照试验和非随机干预组的研究。在男性主导行业的工作场所实施的干预措施必须旨在改善员工的身体和/或心理健康和福祉。日期将没有限制。将搜索以下电子数据库以查找已发表的研究：Web of Science、Embed、MedLine、PsycInfo 和 Cochrane 数据库。搜索策略将包括自由文本术语和 MeSH 词汇，包括“男性主导行业”、“工作场所干预”、“职业压力”、“心理健康”、“心血管疾病”、“血压”、“体重指数” ”和“锻炼”。两位作者将独立选择、审查和提取符合纳入标准的研究数据。 Cochrane 的偏倚风险工具将用于评估偏倚风险。 我们将对纳入的研究进行结构化总结，并在可能的情况下进行荟萃分析或构建信天翁图。讨论 越来越多的干预措施旨在改善员工在工作场所的健康和福祉，但之前没有系统评估其有效性的审查。需要进行系统审查，以确定未来实施那些最有效的干预措施的优先顺序。系统审查注册 PROSPERO CRD42019161283。