当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Hematol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The prognostic significance of ΔSUVmax assessed by PET/CT scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy in patients with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Annals of Hematology ( IF 3.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-03 , DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03892-8
Shenmiao Yang 1 , Liheng Qiu 2 , Xiaojun Huang 1 , Qian Wang 2 , Jin Lu 1
Affiliation  

The objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of the percentage change of maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax) assessed by PET/CT scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (iPET2) in patients with classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (CHL). ΔSUVmax was calculated as follows: the ratio of (SUVmax at baseline-SUVmax at iPET2)/SUVmax at baseline which was determined before initiation of ABVD chemotherapy. The median ΔSUVmax of 46 patients at iPET2 was 87.9% (range - 6.1-100.0%). The optimal ΔSUVmax cutoff value for progression-free survival (PFS) was 83.0% with the receiver operating characteristic curve. The area under the curve for PFS was 0.886 (95% CI 0.788-0.984, p < 0.001). The median PFS of 29 (63.0%) patients who achieved a SUVmax reduction of more than 83.0% was 34 months. The median PFS of 17 (37.0%) patients with ΔSUVmax < 83.0% was 9 months. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). Cohen's kappa coefficient of Deauville Score (DS)- and ΔSUVmax-judged positivity was 0.752 (95% CI 0.592-0.992, p < 0.001), suggesting a strong consistency. Multivariate analysis showed that ΔSUVmax at iPET2 less than 83.0% of SUVmax at diagnosis was an independent factor predicting PFS [HR = 11.339, 95% CI 2.485-51.742, p = 0.002]. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ΔSUVmax<83.0% was 84.6%, 81.8%, 67.7%, 93.1%, and 82.6%, which was similar to that of DS as 61.5%, 87.9%, 66.7%, 85.3%, and 80.4%, respectively. ΔSUVmax<83.0% of iPET2 effectively predicts prognosis of patients with CHL treated with ABVD.

中文翻译:

在经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗2个周期后,通过PET / CT扫描评估ΔSUVmax的预后意义。

这项研究的目的是调查经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(CHL)患者经过2疗程化疗(iPET2)后通过PET / CT扫描评估的最大标准化摄取值(ΔSUVmax)的百分比变化的预后价值。ΔSUVmax的计算如下:(ABSUVD化疗开始前确定的)(基线的SUVmax-iPET2的SUVmax)/基线的SUVmax之比。iPET2上46例患者的中位ΔSUVmax为87.9%(范围-6.1-100.0%)。对于无进展生存期(PFS)的最佳ΔSUVmax临界值与接收器工作特性曲线相符,为83.0%。PFS的曲线下面积为0.886(95%CI 0.788-0.984,p <0.001)。SUVmax降低超过83.0%的29名患者(63.0%)的中位PFS为34个月。PFS中位数为17(37。0%)ΔSUVmax<83.0%的患者为9个月。这种差异是显着的(p <0.001)。多恩评分(DS)和ΔSUVmax判断的阳性的科恩kappa系数为0.752(95%CI 0.592-0.992,p <0.001),表明具有很强的一致性。多因素分析表明,iPET2的ΔSUVmax小于诊断时SUVmax的83.0%是预测PFS的独立因素[HR = 11.339,95%CI 2.485-51.742,p = 0.002]。ΔSUVmax<83.0%的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为84.6%,81.8%,67.7%,93.1%和82.6%,与DS的61.5%,87.9%相似。 ,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。多恩评分(DS)和ΔSUVmax判断的阳性的科恩kappa系数为0.752(95%CI 0.592-0.992,p <0.001),表明具有很强的一致性。多因素分析表明,iPET2的ΔSUVmax小于诊断时SUVmax的83.0%是预测PFS的独立因素[HR = 11.339,95%CI 2.485-51.742,p = 0.002]。ΔSUVmax<83.0%的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为84.6%,81.8%,67.7%,93.1%和82.6%,与DS的61.5%,87.9%相似。 ,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。多恩评分(DS)和ΔSUVmax判断的阳性的科恩kappa系数为0.752(95%CI 0.592-0.992,p <0.001),表明具有很强的一致性。多因素分析表明,iPET2的ΔSUVmax小于诊断时SUVmax的83.0%是预测PFS的独立因素[HR = 11.339,95%CI 2.485-51.742,p = 0.002]。ΔSUVmax<83.0%的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为84.6%,81.8%,67.7%,93.1%和82.6%,与DS的61.5%,87.9%相似。 ,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。多因素分析表明,iPET2的ΔSUVmax小于诊断时SUVmax的83.0%是预测PFS的独立因素[HR = 11.339,95%CI 2.485-51.742,p = 0.002]。ΔSUVmax<83.0%的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为84.6%,81.8%,67.7%,93.1%和82.6%,与DS的61.5%,87.9%相似。 ,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。多因素分析表明,iPET2的ΔSUVmax小于诊断时SUVmax的83.0%是预测PFS的独立因素[HR = 11.339,95%CI 2.485-51.742,p = 0.002]。ΔSUVmax<83.0%的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为84.6%,81.8%,67.7%,93.1%和82.6%,与DS的61.5%,87.9%相似。 ,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。与DS相似,分别为61.5%,87.9%,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。与DS相似,分别为61.5%,87.9%,66.7%,85.3%和80.4%。iPET2的ΔSUVmax<83.0%有效预测ABVD治疗的CHL患者的预后。
更新日期:2020-01-04
down
wechat
bug