Objectives. The objectives of this pilot study were to analyze the functional differences and the differences regarding the perception of health-related quality of life between people affected by ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively, and between these and their normative groups. Methods. A pre-post design study was conducted with 30 patients aged during eight weeks. It assessed disability, mobility, and health-related quality of life. Exact nonparametric tests were used to compare both types of stroke, and -tests and effect size estimates were employed to compare the stroke group and the normative group. Results. At baseline, there were differences in disability (“getting along” domain), where a poorer result was obtained by the hemorrhagic stroke group, and in the “vitality” and “mental health” domains of the health-related quality of life test, where the ischemic group obtained poorer results. Both groups made significant progress in their health assessments and functionality after eight weeks, and no significant differences were found between them at that time. The scores obtained in both groups differed statistically from the normative values, both at baseline and at posttest. Conclusions. Regardless of the stroke type, divergent results were only found in two domains, “vitality” and “mental health.” There was an improvement over time, but the scores obtained were still lower than those observed in the normative group, which indicated that the participants’ health was highly compromised. This study provides more information for faster rehabilitation after stroke; even so, more studies are needed.

中文翻译：

---

中度卒中患者的功能程度和对健康相关生活质量的认知：缺血性和出血性类型的差异。

目标。这项试点研究的目的是分别分析受缺血性和出血性中风影响的人以及这些人与其规范组之间的功能差异和对健康相关生活质量感知的差异。方法。对 30 名年龄较大的患者进行了一项前后设计研究在八周内。它评估了残疾、行动能力和与健康相关的生活质量。精确的非参数检验用于比较两种类型的中风，并且-检验和效应量估计用于比较中风组和正常组。结果. 在基线，残疾（“相处”领域）存在差异，出血性中风组的结果较差，健康相关生活质量测试的“活力”和“心理健康”领域，其中缺血组获得较差的结果。八周后，两组的健康评估和功能都取得了显着进步，当时他们之间没有发现显着差异。在基线和后测中，两组获得的分数都与标准值有统计学差异。结论. 无论中风类型如何，仅在“活力”和“心理健康”两个领域发现了不同的结果。随着时间的推移有所改善，但获得的分数仍低于正常组中观察到的分数，这表明参与者的健康受到了严重损害。这项研究为中风后更快的康复提供了更多信息；即便如此，还需要进行更多的研究。