当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Neuropsychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Psychometrics of a simple method for scoring organizational approach on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure.
Journal of Neuropsychology ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2007-03-01 , DOI: 10.1348/174866407x180800
Steven R Smith 1 , Jenss Chang , Katrina J Schnoebelen , Jordan W Edwards , Amanda M Servesko , Sara J Walker
Affiliation  

The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) is a commonly used neuropsychological measure that assesses visuospatial processing, planning and visuomotor integration. Using samples of clinically referred (N = 20) and non-clinical (N = 44) adults, the present study examines the psychometric properties of a simple method of scoring organizational approach to the ROCF. Developed by Savage et al. (1999) and refined by Deckersbach et al. (2000), this simple 5-point organizational scoring system allows for the quick and accurate assessment of organizational quality. Results suggest that this system is internally consistent and can be scored reliably. Correlations with measures of visuomotor integration and accuracy of rendition after a delay provide evidence of convergent validity. Organization scores were independent of both Verbal and Performance IQ estimates. However, discriminant validity analyses found that high-functioning patients referred for a neuropsychological assessment did not score significantly different from a non-clinical sample, raising questions about the diagnostic utility of this measure with less impaired populations. Implications for clinical practice are discussed, as are directions for future research.

中文翻译:

一种对Rey-Osterrieth复杂人物评分组织方法的简单方法的心理计量学。

Rey-Osterrieth复合体形(ROCF)是一种常用的神经心理学测量方法,用于评估视觉空间加工,计划和视觉运动整合。本研究使用临床上提及的(N = 20)成年人和非临床上(N = 44)成年人的样本,研究了一种简单的对ROCF进行组织评分的简单方法的心理计量学特性。由Savage等人开发。(1999年),并由Deckersbach等人完善。(2000年),这种简单的5点组织评分系统可以快速准确地评估组织质量。结果表明该系统在内部是一致的,并且可以可靠地评分。与视觉运动积分和延迟后的引伸准确性的测量结果的相关性提供了收敛效度的证据。组织得分独立于口头和绩效智商估计。但是,判别效度分析发现,接受神经心理学评估的高功能患者与非临床样本的得分没有显着差异,这对人群较少的患者对该方法的诊断实用性提出了质疑。讨论了对临床实践的影响以及未来研究的方向。
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug