当前位置: X-MOL 学术Crisis › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Exploration of Benefits and Potential Harmful Effects of an Online Forum for Visitors to the Suicide Prevention Platform in The Netherlands.
Crisis ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-01 , DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000627
Jan K Mokkenstorm 1, 2, 3 , Saskia Y M Mérelle 1 , Jan H Smit 2 , Aartjan T F Beekman 2 , Ad J F M Kerkhof 4 , Annemiek Huisman 5 , Renske Gilissen 1
Affiliation  

Background: Online forums that enable peer-to-peer interaction are widespread and readily available. Aim: This study aimed to identify the reach, benefits, and potential harmful effects for visitors to an online forum embedded in a suicide prevention platform in The Netherlands. Method: The study collected web-based questionnaires from online forum users and moderated posts. Descriptive quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Results: The online forum had 330 members in 2017, of whom 130 were active users (posting at least one message). Respondents (n = 106) experienced from a high severity of suicidal ideation (78%). A minority (12%) visited the forum to find suicide methods and 3% to find a suicide partner. Among respondents who had visited the forum more than once (n = 49), 53% reported no changes in feelings directly after forum use, 35% felt better and 12% felt worse. Peer support and anonymity were the most mentioned benefits, whereas no personal contacts and few reactions to postings were perceived as limitations. Suicide threats and the search for methods were the main reasons for moderating posts. Limitations: Usage habits and user experiences were available from a relatively small group that visited the forum more than once. Conclusion: In its current form, the forum has a low reach with few benefits and a potential for harm for its users. With a questionable benefit-to-risk ratio, the added value of the online forum appears to be small.

中文翻译:

探索荷兰自杀预防平台在线论坛的好处和潜在的有害影响。

背景:支持点对点交互的在线论坛非常广泛,并且随时可用。目的:本研究旨在确定荷兰自杀预防平台中一个在线论坛的访问者的影响范围,益处以及潜在的有害影响。方法:该研究从在线论坛用户和主持人的帖子中收集了基于网络的问卷。进行描述性的定量和定性分析。结果:2017年,在线论坛有330个成员,其中130个是活跃用户(至少发布了一条消息)。受访者(n = 106)的自杀意念严重程度较高(78%)。少数(12%)参观了论坛以寻找自杀方法,而3%的人寻找自杀伴侣。在访问论坛不止一次的受访者中(n = 49),53%的人说在使用论坛后感觉没有直接变化,35%的人感觉更好,12%的人感觉更糟。同事支持和匿名是最常提及的好处,而没有个人联系和对发布的很少反应被视为限制。自杀威胁和寻找方法是裁员的主要原因。局限性:相对较少的小组(不止一次访问了论坛)提供了使用习惯和用户体验。结论:在目前的形式下,该论坛的覆盖面很低,几乎没有好处,并且可能给用户带来伤害。由于利益风险比可疑,在线论坛的附加值似乎很小。而没有个人联系和对发布的反应很少被视为限制。自杀威胁和寻找方法是裁员的主要原因。局限性:相对较少的小组(不止一次访问了论坛)提供了使用习惯和用户体验。结论:在目前的形式下,该论坛的覆盖面很低,几乎没有好处,并且可能给用户带来伤害。由于利益风险比可疑,在线论坛的附加值似乎很小。而没有个人联系和对发布的反应很少被视为限制。自杀威胁和寻找方法是裁员的主要原因。局限性:相对较少的小组(不止一次访问了论坛)提供了使用习惯和用户体验。结论:在目前的形式下,该论坛的覆盖面很低,几乎没有好处,并且可能给用户带来伤害。由于利益风险比可疑,在线论坛的附加值似乎很小。该论坛的影响力很低,几乎没有好处,并且可能会对用户造成伤害。由于利益风险比可疑,在线论坛的附加值似乎很小。该论坛的影响力很低,几乎没有好处,并且可能会对用户造成伤害。由于利益风险比可疑,在线论坛的附加值似乎很小。
更新日期:2020-05-01
down
wechat
bug