Numerous recommendations and guidelines aim to improve the quality, timeliness and transparency of medical publications. However, these guidelines use ambiguous language that can be challenging to interpret, particularly for speakers of English as a second language. Cultural expectations within the Asia-Pacific region raise additional challenges and several studies have suggested that awareness and application of ethical publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region is relatively low compared with other regions. However, guidance on applying ethical publication practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region is lacking. This commentary aims to improve publication practices in the Asia-Pacific region by providing guidance on applying the 10 principles of the Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) guidelines and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship. Recommendations are provided for encore presentations, applying the ICMJE authorship criteria in the context of regional cultural expectations, and the role of study sponsors and professional medical writers. Ongoing barriers to compliance with guidelines are also highlighted, and additional guidance is provided to support authors submitting manuscripts for publication. The roles of regional journals, regulatory authorities and professional bodies in improving practices are also discussed.

中文翻译：

---

在亚太地区应用良好出版规范 3 指南的指南

许多建议和指南旨在提高医学出版物的质量、及时性和透明度。然而，这些指南使用的语言含糊不清，可能难以解释，特别是对于以英语为第二语言的人来说。亚太地区的文化期望带来了额外的挑战，一些研究表明，与其他地区相比，亚太地区对出版道德实践的认识和应用相对较低。然而，亚太地区缺乏应用道德出版实践指南的指导。本评论旨在通过提供应用良好出版实践 3 (GPP3) 指南的 10 项原则和国际医学期刊编辑委员会 (ICMJE) 作者身份标准的指导，改善亚太地区的出版实践。为加演演示提供建议，在区域文化期望的背景下应用 ICMJE 作者标准，以及研究赞助商和专业医学作家的作用。还强调了遵守指南的持续障碍，并提供了额外的指导来支持作者提交稿件以供出版。还讨论了区域期刊、监管机构和专业机构在改进实践方面的作用。