REDD+ remains a critical tool for dealing with increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Like other global-level initiatives, REDD+ has strong supporters and critics. Despite the division over its merits, little has been done to understand how a national-level audience responds to the program’s arrival in a partner country and which players drive a program’s implementation. Here we coded the archives of two Guyanese newspapers to identify the policy actors, institutions, and concepts (players) that drove the implementation of the country’s Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS). Two groups of players—super-key and key—dictated the direction of the LCDS implementation. Super-key players used the state-owned media to advocate their positions, while players who felt they would be punished by the LCDS implementation published their positions in the privately-owned media. Therefore, like responses to other global-level environmental challenges, views around the LCDS were divided.

中文翻译：

---

识别与REDD +实施相关的权力，参与者和情感：圭亚那的LCDS案例。

REDD +仍然是应对不断增加的大气二氧化碳水平的关键工具。像其他全球性举措一样，REDD +也拥有强大的支持者和批评家。尽管在优缺点上存在分歧，但对于了解国家/地区的受众如何响应该计划抵达合作伙伴国家以及由哪些参与者来推动该计划的实施，几乎没有做任何事情。在这里，我们对两家圭亚那报纸的档案进行编码，以确定推动该国《低碳发展战略》（LCDS）实施的政策参与者，机构和概念（参与者）。两组players-的超-重点和关键-dictated LCD中实现的方向。中超-关键玩家使用国有媒体来倡导自己的立场，而那些认为自己会受到LCDS实施惩罚的玩家则在私有媒体上发表自己的立场。因此，就像对其他全球性环境挑战的回应一样，LCDS周围的观点也存在分歧。