BACKGROUND This article presents the experience of one community-based participatory research (CBPR) board and moves board feedback beyond its dialogue with affiliated researchers, expanding the conversations to the broad research community. METHODS The board member authors of this article were part of the Sexual Health Initiative to Foster Transformation (SHIFT), which had some of the highest subject participation rates within the literature on college sexual assault-84% in a daily diary study (N = 427) and 67% in a survey of 2,500 randomly selected students-and enjoyed an overall positive sentiment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the experience of board members this article outlines four recommendations for the construction of CBPR studies: meeting frequently, co-education of board members and researchers, addressing power and privilege, and prioritizing highly valued participation, with mutual respect for and recognition of distinct roles and expertise.

中文翻译：

---

咨询委员会的观点，来自基于校园社区的性暴力参与研究项目。

背景技术本文介绍了一个基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）委员会的经验，并将委员会的反馈超出了其与附属研究人员的对话，从而将对话扩展到了广泛的研究社区。方法本文的董事会成员是促进性转换的性健康倡议（SHIFT）的一部分，该倡议在日常性日记研究中，大学性侵犯文献中的受试者参与率最高，达到84％（N = 427） ）和对2500名随机选择的学生进行的调查中，有67％的受访者总体上持积极态度。结果与结论基于董事会成员的经验，本文概述了构建CBPR研究的四个建议：频繁开会，董事会成员与研究人员的共同教育，解决权力与特权，