INTRODUCTION In recent years, there have been numerous calls by researchers to adopt multi-disciplinary and international perspectives to address the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic. Meaningful and prudent public health policy should be based on sound empirical data and research. Henceforth, our study aims to contribute to the current literature by conducting a comprehensive global mapping and determine the landscapes of HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndromes (AIDS) research covering the years between 1983 and 2017. METHODS Bibliometric and content analysis was used to describe trends in research productivity, usages, research collaborations, and clusters of research topics. Exploratory factor analysis, Jaccard's similarity index, and Ward dendrogram were applied to abstracts' contents to determine the development of interdisciplinary research landscapes. RESULTS The United States of America continues to lead in research production and be main hub for author- and country-level collaborations. Research employing an epidemiological, social, and/or behavioral perspective for studying HIV/AIDS was found to dwarf in the presence of basic and biomedical HIV research. Interdisciplinary approaches to HIV research have been increasing with the creation of various research landscapes: strong constructs of studies examining health status, clinical responses, and HIV treatment, risk behaviors have been formed, while research topics relating to psycho-behavioral and cultural aspects as well as services have emerged along. CONCLUSIONS To effectively prevent and control the disease, more researches are needed to provide culturally relevant and/or contextualized evidence of effective interventions. It is also necessary to enhance the ability and partnership of local researchers as well as invest in research infrastructure at national and regional levels to implement high-quality studies since they are the "gate-keepers" who could respond to local changes in a timely manner. These types of research could be a helpful guide for international donors, governments, and academicians to set up research priorities in target groups and settings, and to develop future research agendas globally.

中文翻译：

---

1983年至2017年间HIV /后天免疫机能丧失综合症研究的跨学科格局的演变：全球研究政策分析（GAPRESEARCH）的结果。

引言近年来，研究人员呼吁采用多学科和国际观点来应对人类免疫缺陷病毒（HIV）大流行。有意义和审慎的公共卫生政策应基于可靠的经验数据和研究。此后，我们的研究旨在通过进行全面的全球测绘并确定涵盖1983年至2017年间的HIV /后天免疫机能丧失综合症（AIDS）的研究状况，为当前的文献做出贡献。方法采用文献计量法和内容分析来描述趋势研究生产力，用途，研究合作和研究主题群。探索性因素分析，Jaccard相似度指数和Ward树状图被应用于摘要的 内容来确定跨学科研究领域的发展。结果美利坚合众国继续领导研究工作，并成为作者和国家/地区级合作的主要枢纽。在基础和生物医学艾滋病研究的存在下，发现从流行病学，社会和/或行为角度研究艾滋病毒/艾滋病的研究发现相形见to。随着各种研究领域的创建，跨学科的HIV研究方法不断增加：检查健康状况，临床反应和HIV治疗的强有力的研究结构已经形成，风险行为已经形成，与此同时，与心理，行为和文化方面有关的研究主题也已形成随着服务的出现。结论为了有效地预防和控制该疾病，需要进行更多的研究以提供有效干预措施的文化相关和/或背景相关证据。还必须增强本地研究人员的能力和伙伴关系，以及在国家和地区一级投资于研究基础设施以实施高质量的研究，因为他们是可以及时响应本地变化的“门卫” 。这些类型的研究可能对国际捐助者，政府和院士在目标群体和环境中建立研究优先级以及在全球范围内制定未来研究议程很有帮助。还必须增强本地研究人员的能力和伙伴关系，以及在国家和地区一级投资于研究基础设施以实施高质量的研究，因为他们是可以及时响应本地变化的“门卫” 。这些类型的研究可能对国际捐助者，政府和院士在目标群体和环境中建立研究优先级以及在全球范围内制定未来研究议程很有帮助。还必须增强本地研究人员的能力和伙伴关系，以及在国家和地区一级投资于研究基础设施以实施高质量的研究，因为他们是可以及时响应本地变化的“门卫” 。这些类型的研究可能对国际捐助者，政府和院士在目标群体和环境中建立研究优先级以及在全球范围内制定未来研究议程很有帮助。