当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied ( IF 2.813 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-26 , DOI: 10.1037/xap0000250
Phot Dhammapeera 1 , Xiaoqing Hu 2 , Zara M Bergström 1
Affiliation  

Imagining counterfactual versions of past events can distort memory. In 3 experiments, we examined whether imagining a false alibi for a mock crime would make suspects appear less guilty in a concealed memory detection test, the autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT), which aims to determine which of 2 autobiographical events are true. First, "guilty" participants completed a mock crime, whereas "innocent" participants completed an innocent act. Next, some of the guilty participants were asked to imagine a false alibi that corresponded to the innocent act. Finally, all groups completed the aIAT. Across experiments, we varied the type of aIAT used and also compared the effectiveness of the false alibi countermeasure when only imagined once, versus when it was repeatedly imagined over a week-long period. The aIAT accurately detected the mock crime as true for guilty participants without a false alibi, but was consistently less able to detect the mock crime as true for guilty participants who had imagined a false alibi. The findings suggest that if guilty suspects fabricate an alibi, this may create a memory for the alibi that appears to be true based on the aIAT, which is problematic for its real-life applications in concealed memory detection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

想象错误的不在场证明会损害自传式隐式关联测试的隐蔽记忆检测。

想象一下过去事件的反事实版本会扭曲内存。在3个实验中,我们检查了假想假冒假冒犯罪的假象是否会使嫌疑人在隐藏的记忆检测测试(自传内隐联想测试(aIAT))中显得较少内gui,该测试旨在确定2个自传事件中的哪一个是真实的。首先,“有罪”的参与者完成了模拟犯罪,而“无辜”的参与者完成了无辜的行为。接下来,一些有罪的参与者被要求想象与无辜的行为相对应的虚假的不在场证明。最后,所有小组都完成了aIAT。在整个实验中,我们改变了所使用的aIAT的类型,并且还比较了仅假想一次的假借口反制措施的有效性,以及在一周的时间里反复假想的反假说对策的有效性。对于没有假借口的犯罪参与者,aIAT可以准确地将模拟犯罪检测为真实,但对于曾经假想过的借口的犯罪参与者,模拟航空犯罪的能力始终较弱。研究结果表明,如果有罪嫌犯制造了犯罪嫌疑人,这可能会为基于aIAT的犯罪事实创建一个犯罪嫌疑人的记忆,这对于其在隐蔽记忆检测中的实际应用是有问题的。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。这可能会为基于aIAT的不在场证明创建内存,这对于其在隐藏内存检测中的实际应用是有问题的。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。这可能会为基于aIAT的不在场证明创建内存,这对于其在隐藏内存检测中的实际应用是有问题的。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug