This article reviews the relationship between people's perceptions of unfairness and their tendencies to think, feel, and act in radicalizing ways. Various theories of radicalization processes are reviewed that examine key aspects of the psychology of perceived unfairness. The review shows that experienced group deprivation and perceived immorality are among the core judgments that can drive Muslim radicalization, right-wing radicalization, and left-wing radicalization. Symbols of injustice, the legitimization of revolutionary thought, and the experience of unfair treatment can also increase radicalization. The review also examines core moderators (e.g., uncertainty and insufficient self-correction) and mediators (e.g., externally oriented emotions) of the linkage between perceived unfairness and core components of radicalization (e.g., rigidity of thoughts, hot-cognitive defense of cultural worldviews, and violent rejection of democratic principles and the rule of law). The review discusses how the study of unfairness and radicalization contributes to a robust and meaningful science of psychology.

中文翻译：

---

不公平和激进。

本文回顾了人们对不公平的看法与他们以激进方式思考，感觉和行动的倾向之间的关系。审查了激进化过程的各种理论，这些理论考察了不公平心理的关键方面。审查显示，经验丰富的群体剥夺和感知的不道德行为是可能导致穆斯林激进，右翼激进和左翼激进的核心判断之一。不公正的象征，革命思想的合法化以及不公正待遇的经验也会加剧激进化。审查还检查了核心主持人（例如，不确定性和自我纠正不足）和调解人（例如，外部情感）在感知到的不公平与激进化的核心要素（例如，僵化的思想，对文化世界观的热认知辩护以及对民主原则和法治的暴力拒绝）。这篇综述讨论了对不公平和激进主义的研究如何有助于建立健全而有意义的心理学。