当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
"Individual differences in search and monitoring for color targets in dynamic visual displays": Correction to Muhl-Richardson et al. (2018).
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied ( IF 2.813 ) Pub Date : 2019-06-01 , DOI: 10.1037/xap0000235


Reports an error in "Individual differences in search and monitoring for color targets in dynamic visual displays" by Alex Muhl-Richardson, Hayward J. Godwin, Matthew Garner, Julie A. Hadwin, Simon P. Liversedge and Nick Donnelly (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2018[Dec], Vol 24[4], 564-577). In the article, there was a formatting error in table 2 on page 573. The corrected table is presented in the erratum, and the online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-04009-001.) Many real-world tasks now involve monitoring visual representations of data that change dynamically over time. Monitoring dynamically changing displays for the onset of targets can be done in two ways: detecting targets directly, post-onset, or predicting their onset from the prior state of distractors. In the present study, participants' eye movements were measured as they monitored arrays of 108 colored squares whose colors changed systematically over time. Across three experiments, the data show that participants detected the onset of targets both directly and predictively. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that predictive detection was only possible when supported by sequential color changes that followed a scale ordered in color space. Experiment 3 included measures of individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and anxious affect and a manipulation of target prevalence in the search task. It found that predictive monitoring for targets, and decisions about target onsets, were influenced by interactions between individual differences in verbal and spatial WMC and intolerance of uncertainty, a characteristic that reflects worry about uncertain future events. The results have implications for the selection of individuals tasked with monitoring dynamic visual displays for target onsets. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

“在动态视觉显示中搜索和监视颜色目标的个体差异”:对Muhl-Richardson等人的更正。(2018)。

报告了Alex Muhl-Richardson,Hayward J.Godwin,Matthew Garner,Julie A.Hadwin,Simon P.Liversedge和Nick Donnelly撰写的“动态视觉显示中色彩目标的搜索和监视的个体差异”中的错误(实验心理学杂志:Applied,2018 [Dec],Vol 24 [4],564-577)。在这篇文章中,第573页的表2中存在格式错误。更正后的表显示在勘误中,并且本文的在线版本已得到更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2018-04009-001中。)现在,许多实际任务涉及监视随时间动态变化的数据的可视表示。可以通过两种方式监视动态变化的显示以了解目标的发生:直接检测目标,发生后,或根据干扰因素的先前状态预测其发作。在本研究中,测量参与者的眼球运动是因为他们监视了108个有色正方形的阵列,这些颜色随着时间的推移会系统地改变。在三个实验中,数据显示参与者直接和预测地检测到目标的发作。实验1和2表明,只有在颜色空间中按顺序缩放的顺序颜色变化支持预测性检测时,才可能进行预测。实验3包括测量工作记忆能力(WMC)和焦虑情绪的个体差异以及对搜索任务中目标患病率的操纵。研究发现,对目标进行预测性监控以及对目标发作的决策,受到口头和空间WMC个体差异与不确定性不容忍之间相互作用的影响,这一特征反映了对不确定性未来事件的担忧。该结果对选择负责监测目标发作动态视觉显示的人员的选择具有影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2019-11-01
down
wechat
bug