当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Parasitol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How effective is preening against mobile ectoparasites? An experimental test with pigeons and hippoboscid flies.
International Journal for Parasitology ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2012-07-13 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.03.005
Waite Jessica L 1 , Autumn R Henry , Dale H Clayton
Affiliation  

Birds combat ectoparasites with many defences but the first line of defence is grooming behaviour, which includes preening with the bill and scratching with the feet. Preening has been shown to be very effective against ectoparasites. However, most tests have been with feather lice, which are relatively slow moving. Less is known about the effectiveness of preening as a defence against more mobile and evasive ectoparasites such as hippoboscid flies. Hippoboscids, which feed on blood, have direct effects on the host such asanaemia, as well as indirect effects as vectors of pathogens. Hence, effective defence against hippoboscid flies is important. We used captive Rock Pigeons (Columba livia) to test whether preening behaviour helps to control pigeon flies (Pseudolynchia canariensis). We found that pigeons responded to fly infestation by preening twice as much as pigeons without flies. Preening birds killed twice as many flies over the course of our week-long experiment as birds with impaired preening; however, preening did not kill all of the flies. We also tested the role of the bill overhang, which is critical for effective preening against feather lice, by experimentally removing the overhang and re-measuring the effectiveness of preening against flies. Birds without overhangs were as effective at controlling flies as were birds with overhangs. Overall, we found that preening is effective against mobile hippoboscid flies, yet it does not eliminate them. We discuss the potential impact of preening on the transmission dynamics of blood parasites vectored by hippoboscid flies.

中文翻译:

预防流动性外寄生虫效果如何?鸽子和河马蝇的实验测试。

鸟类通过多种防御措施对抗外寄生虫,但第一道防线是修饰行为,其中包括梳理钞票并用脚抓挠。整理已证明对体外寄生虫非常有效。但是,大多数测试都是用羽毛虱子进行的,羽毛虱子的移动相对较慢。人们还不太了解装扮成能抵御更多流动和逃避的外寄生物(例如河马蝇)的功效。以血液为食的河马杆菌对宿主(如贫血)具有直接作用,并且作为病原体的载体也有间接作用。因此,有效防御河马蝇很重要。我们使用圈养原鸽(Columba livia)来测试修饰行为是否有助于控制鸽蝇(Pseudolynchia canariensis)。我们发现,鸽子对飞蝇的反应是不带蝇的鸽子的两倍。在我们为期一周的实验过程中,美化鸟类杀死的苍蝇是美化受损鸟类的两倍。然而,整理并没有杀死所有的苍蝇。我们还通过实验去除悬垂物并重新测量了防蝇蝇的功效,测试了法案悬垂物的作用,这对于有效防止羽毛虱子的形成至关重要。没有悬突的鸟在控制苍蝇方面与悬突的鸟一样有效。总的来说,我们发现整理对移动河马果蝇是有效的,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了装扮对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。在我们为期一周的实验过程中,美化鸟类杀死的苍蝇是美化受损鸟类的两倍。然而,整理并没有杀死所有的苍蝇。我们还通过实验去除悬垂物并重新测量了防蝇蝇的功效,测试了法案悬垂物的作用,这对于有效防止羽毛虱子的形成至关重要。没有悬突的鸟在控制苍蝇方面与悬突的鸟一样有效。总的来说,我们发现整理对移动河马果蝇是有效的,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了染整对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。在我们为期一周的实验过程中,美化鸟类杀死的苍蝇是美化受损鸟类的两倍。然而,整理并没有杀死所有的苍蝇。我们还通过实验去除悬垂物并重新测量了防蝇蝇的功效,测试了法案悬垂物的作用,这对于有效防止羽毛虱子的形成至关重要。没有悬垂的鸟在控制苍蝇方面与悬垂的鸟一样有效。总的来说,我们发现整理对移动河马果蝇是有效的,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了染整对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。我们还通过实验去除悬垂物并重新测量了防蝇蝇的功效,测试了法案悬垂物的作用,这对于有效防止羽毛虱子的形成至关重要。没有悬垂的鸟在控制苍蝇方面与悬垂的鸟一样有效。总的来说,我们发现整理对移动河马果蝇是有效的,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了染整对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。我们还通过实验去除悬垂物并重新测量了防蝇蝇的功效,测试了法案悬垂物的作用,这对于有效防止羽毛虱子的形成至关重要。没有悬垂的鸟在控制苍蝇方面与悬垂的鸟一样有效。总的来说,我们发现整理对移动河马果蝇是有效的,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了染整对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。我们发现,整理可有效抵御流动河马蝇,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了染整对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。我们发现,整理可有效对抗流动河马蝇,但并不能消除它们。我们讨论了染整对河马果蝇媒介的血液寄生虫传播动力学的潜在影响。
更新日期:2012-04-02
down
wechat
bug