How can lineups be designed to elicit the best achievable memory performance? One step toward that goal is to compare lineup procedures. In a recent comparison of U.S. and U.K. lineup procedures, discriminability and reliability was better when memory was tested using the U.S. procedure. However, because there are so many differences between the procedures, it is unclear what explains this superior performance. The main goal of the current research is, therefore, to systematically isolate the differences between the U.S. and U.K. lineups to determine their effects on discriminability and reliability. In 5 experiments, we compared (a) presentation format: simultaneous versus sequential; (b) stimulus format: photos versus videos; (c) number of views: 1-lap versus 2-lap versus choice in both video and photo lineups; and (d) lineup size: 6- versus 9-lineup members. Most of the comparisons did not show appreciable differences, but one comparison did: simultaneous presentation yielded better discriminability than sequential presentation. If the results replicate, then policymakers should recommend using a simultaneous lineup procedure. Moreover, consistent with previous research, identifications made with high confidence were higher in reliability than identifications made with low confidence. Thus, official lineup protocols should require collecting confidence because of the diagnostic value added. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

设计警察阵容以最大化内存性能。

如何设计阵容以实现最佳的内存性能？实现这一目标的第一步是比较阵容程序。在最近对美国和英国阵容程序的比较中，使用美国程序测试内存时，可分辨性和可靠性更好。但是，由于这些过程之间有太多差异，因此尚不清楚是什么原因解释了这种出色的性能。因此，当前研究的主要目标是系统地隔离美英阵容之间的差异，以确定它们对可分辨性和可靠性的影响。在5个实验中，我们比较了（a）演示格式：同步与顺序；（b）刺激形式：照片与视频；（c）观看次数：视频和照片阵容中1圈对比2圈对比的选择；和（d）阵容大小：6人和9人阵容成员。大多数比较没有显示出明显的差异，但有一个比较：连续呈现比顺序呈现更好的可分辨性。如果结果重复，则决策者应建议使用同时排队程序。此外，与先前的研究一致，高置信度的识别结果比低置信度的识别结果更高。因此，由于增加了诊断价值，正式的阵容协议应要求收集信心。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2019 APA，保留所有权利）。那么政策制定者应建议使用同时进行的程序。此外，与先前的研究一致，高置信度的识别结果比低置信度的识别结果更高。因此，由于增加了诊断价值，因此正式的阵容协议应要求收集可信度。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2019 APA，保留所有权利）。那么政策制定者应建议使用同时进行的程序。此外，与先前的研究一致，高置信度的识别结果比低置信度的识别结果具有更高的可靠性。因此，由于增加了诊断价值，因此正式的阵容协议应要求收集可信度。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2019 APA，保留所有权利）。