当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evaluation of the light transmission of chairside polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramics in different shades and thicknesses
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1177/2280800018807109
İbrahim Duran 1 , Necati Kaleli 1 , Çağrı Ural 1 , İdris Kavut 1
Affiliation  

Background: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the amount of polymerizing light passing through hybrid ceramic specimens in different shades and thicknesses. Methods: Rectangular-shaped feldspathic ceramic computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) blocks and translucent and high translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic CAD-CAM blocks in four different shades (1M1, 1M2, 2M2, and 3M2) were sectioned in four different thicknesses (0.8, 1.5, 2, and 3 mm), and a total of 48 groups (n = 10) were obtained. Feldspathic ceramic specimens served as the control group. The light transmission of each ceramic specimen was measured three times by using a light-emitting diode and a radiometer. Data were statistically analyzed by using univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey honest significant difference, and Tamhane T2 tests (α = 0.05). Results: Translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic specimens exhibited significantly (p < 0.001) lower light transmission values than high translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic and feldspathic ceramic specimens, whereas feldspathic ceramic specimens exhibited significantly (p < 0.001) higher light transmission than translucent and high translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic specimens. The amount of light transmission significantly (p < 0.05) decreased when the shade value decreased and the thickness increased. Conclusions: Polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic specimens showed lower light transmission values than feldspathic ceramic specimens, and the amount of light transmission was affected by the ceramic shade and thickness.

中文翻译:

不同色调和厚度的椅旁聚合物渗透混合陶瓷的透光率评价

背景:这项体外研究旨在评估通过不同色调和厚度的混合陶瓷样品的聚合光量。方法:矩形长石陶瓷计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造 (CAD-CAM) 块和四种不同色调(1M1、1M2、2M2 和 3M2)的半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷 CAD-CAM 块在获得了四种不同的厚度(0.8、1.5、2 和 3 毫米),总共获得了 48 组(n = 10)。长石陶瓷标本作为对照组。使用发光二极管和辐射计测量每个陶瓷样品的透光率 3 次。通过使用单变量方差分析(ANOVA)和单因素方差分析对数据进行统计分析,Tukey诚实显着差异,和Tamhane T2检验(α=0.05)。结果:与高半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷和长石陶瓷样品相比,半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷样品表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 较低的透光率值,而长石陶瓷样品的透光率显着高于半透明和高半透明样品 (p < 0.001)聚合物渗透混合陶瓷样品。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。和 Tamhane T2 测试 (α = 0.05)。结果:与高半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷和长石陶瓷样品相比,半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷样品表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 较低的透光率值,而长石陶瓷样品的透光率显着高于半透明和高半透明样品 (p < 0.001)聚合物渗透混合陶瓷样品。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。和 Tamhane T2 测试 (α = 0.05)。结果:与高半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷和长石陶瓷样品相比,半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷样品表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 较低的透光率值,而长石陶瓷样品的透光率显着高于半透明和高半透明样品 (p < 0.001)聚合物渗透混合陶瓷样品。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。与高半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷和长石陶瓷样本相比,半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷样本表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 较低的透光率值,而长石陶瓷样本表现出比半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透的显着 (p < 0.001) 更高的透光率混合陶瓷样品。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。与高半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷和长石陶瓷样本相比,半透明聚合物渗透的杂化陶瓷样品表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 较低的透光率值,而长石陶瓷样本的透光率显着 (p < 0.001) 高于半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透的透光率混合陶瓷样品。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。001) 比高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷和长石陶瓷试样的透光率值低,而长石陶瓷试样比半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 更高的透光率。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。001) 比高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷和长石陶瓷试样的透光率值低,而长石陶瓷试样比半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样表现出显着 (p < 0.001) 更高的透光率。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。001) 比半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷样品具有更高的透光率。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。001) 比半透明和高半透明聚合物渗透混合陶瓷样品具有更高的透光率。当阴影值降低和厚度增加时,透光量显着降低(p < 0.05)。结论:聚合物渗透混合陶瓷试样的透光率值低于长石陶瓷试样,透光量受陶瓷色度和厚度的影响。
更新日期:2019-01-01
down
wechat
bug