Abstract Resilience has become a common goal for science-based natural resource management, particularly in the context of changing climate and disturbance regimes. Integrating varying perspectives and definitions of resilience is a complex and often unrecognized challenge to applying resilience concepts to social–ecological systems (SESs) management. Using wildfire as an example, we develop a framework to expose and separate two important dimensions of resilience: the inherent properties that maintain structure, function, or states of an SES and the human perceptions of desirable or valued components of an SES. In doing so, the framework distinguishes between value-free and human-derived, value-explicit dimensions of resilience. Four archetypal scenarios highlight that ecological resilience and human values do not always align and that recognizing and anticipating potential misalignment is critical for developing effective management goals. Our framework clarifies existing resilience theory, connects literature across disciplines, and facilitates use of the resilience concept in research and land-management applications.

中文翻译：

---

整合易发生火灾景观中恢复力的主观和客观维度

摘要 恢复力已成为基于科学的自然资源管理的共同目标，特别是在气候变化和干扰制度的背景下。将复原力概念应用于社会生态系统（SES）管理时，整合不同的复原力观点和定义是一项复杂且常常未被认识到的挑战。以野火为例，我们开发了一个框架来揭示和分离弹性的两个重要维度：维持 SES 的结构、功能或状态的固有属性以及人类对 SES 的理想或有价值的组件的看法。在此过程中，该框架区分了与价值无关的复原力维度和人类衍生的、价值明确的复原力维度。四种典型情景强调，生态恢复力和人类价值观并不总是一致，认识和预测潜在的不一致对于制定有效的管理目标至关重要。我们的框架阐明了现有的复原力理论，连接了跨学科的文献，并促进了复原力概念在研究和土地管理应用中的使用。