Handedness ontogenesis is still under debate in science. This systematic review analyzed articles regarding the theories and basis of handedness formation, highlighting the historical knowledge path that this literature underwent. Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Sciences, Science Direct and PubMed databases were searched. This review included review studies with handedness as the main topic. Only papers written in English with analyses exclusively in neurotypical humans (any age range) were included. Different approaches (genetic, neural, social, and behavioural) were reviewed in light of growing evidence, summarizing the current state of the art. Genetic and environmental/social impacts are common points in most of the reviews, each given more or less importance, depending on the author and theory proposed. Multifactorial, developmental approaches to handedness formation seem to be the most up to date view of the phenomenon. Different control mechanisms between hemisphere and neural asymmetries are also contributing factors to handedness formation.

中文翻译：

---

对惯用性起源的历史，系统的回顾。

惯性本体论在科学界仍处于争论之中。这篇系统的评论分析了有关惯用性形成理论和基础的文章，突出了该文献所经历的历史知识路径。检索Cochrane图书馆，LILACS，Web of Sciences，Science Direct和PubMed数据库。该评价包括以惯用性为主要主题的评价研究。仅包括用英语撰写的，专门针对神经型人类（任何年龄范围）进行分析的论文。鉴于越来越多的证据，对不同的方法（遗传，神经，社会和行为）进行了回顾，总结了当前的最新技术水平。在大多数评论中，遗传和环境/社会影响是共同点，每个评论或多或少都具有重要性，这取决于作者和提出的理论。多因素 习惯性形成的发展方法似乎是该现象的最新观点。半球和神经不对称之间的不同控制机制也是促成旋手性形成的因素。